You are expected to summarize, critique, and report the case study in order to provide reflective examples, connecting theory to practice. The case studies are intended to be free expressions of thoughts, ideas, opinions, solutions, etc. There are no right or wrong answers, but you should address the questions that are provided in the assignment. Read each of the case studies at least twice. The first reading should be just reading the case like a story. On the second reading, read slower and think about the case as you read it. You will find it useful to mark up the case or make a few notes as you read. Following the second reading, make a list of what you think are some of the important issues. The principal, or whoever is the key person, probably did something or did not do something that you believe is or is not good practice. The emphasis is more on the issues that the main person should be aware of and making decisions about, rather than on the specific actions that you think might have been taken. It is appropriate to state what you think should have been done. Go ahead and say what you think should or should not have been done. This is what makes for a good discussion! This project requires you to understand, summarize, critique, and report a case study analysis the professor has selected from scholarly journals. The assignment further requires that you generate relevant examples connecting theory to practice as you synthesize the case study analysis and critique.