Comparative analysis

Comparative analysis

Your group will complete one of the following two projects. A maximum of four members is permitted for either of the group project options.

A:     Comparative analysis
Select three of the companies in the subject outline. Your group’s selection must reflect three different nations.
Compare and contrast the corporate governance practices of these firms and identify at least one recent major challenge experienced by each. How did the respective governance structures enable the firms to respond? What could the firms in your analysis learn from each other?

Selected assignment question
A

Proposed companies or frameworks
•    PLEASE HELP US ANSWER THIS FORM


Requirements:

Please read the file ‘Structure A’ and must follow that structure to write this paper that is very important! Before write this paper please also reading the ‘Assignment 2 Marking Rubric’ this file, we need get a high mark to pass this subject. Thank you very much!!!

Your group will complete one of the following two projects (“A” or “B”).
A:Comparative analysis
Select three of the following companies. Your group’s selection must represent three different nations:
AirAsia (Malaysia)
Mitsubishi Corp (Japan)
Aeroflot (Russia)
Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (China)
Petro China (China)
Accor (France)
Siemens (Germany)
BMW Group (Germany)
Apple (the United States)
General Motor (the United States)
Siam Commercial Bank (Thailand)
Banco do Brasil (Brazil)
Maersk (Denmark)
LG Electronics (South Korea)
Piaggio (Italy)
TNT Express (Netherlands)

Compare and contrast the corporate governance practices of these firms and identify at least one recent major challenge experienced by each firm. How did the respective governance structures enable the firms to respond? What could the firms in your analysis learn from each other?

Papers must comply with in Arial 12 point font, using 1.5 line spacing and paragraphs must be fully justified at both the left and right margin. Your left and right margins should be set to 3.5 cm to allow space for comments to be made by the assessor.

Posted in Uncategorized

This question has been answered.

Get Answer

Leave a Reply