An argument for nationalizing educational standards
An argument for nationalizing educational standards is that failing to educate students across the nation presents a national security threat; we will not be as competitive as our international competitors without a strong standardized education system. Is this a valid argument? Are there reasonable alternatives other than national education standards to protect national security? What other reasons are there for national educational standards other than promoting national security. (one source, less than 150 words )
Sample Solution
Yes, this is a valid argument. Nationalizing educational standards can ensure that students across the country have access to high-quality education and are prepared for their respective futures when competing internationally. Alternatives to national education standards include providing additional funding to states with inadequate educational systems and introducing incentives such as loan forgiveness in exchange for postsecondary degrees. Additionally, nationalizing educational standards can provide more equitable access to resources regardless of geography, socio-economic status, or ethnicity. This could lead to increased graduation rates and higher levels of college attainment which would benefit both individuals and society at large by creating a more educated workforce.