Balancing between right of privacy and freedom of expression

Balancing between right of privacy and freedom of expression Order Description -law of breach confident. -protection of freedom Act 2012 -defamation Act 2013 -Data protection Act -Harassment Act 1997 - Committee in Super Injunction -Press Complaint Committee ( Code of Practice ) -Law of trespass and libel All these and others in context of strike balance between privacy and freedom of expression. *May you agree that Dayana case shows the need for privacy since no enforceable law was exist, but Naomi Camblle case very good and key example to illustrate the Uk approach in balancing those two rights. *I am sure that you going to use a lot of cases to support the point you make. There are a lot of related cases her - Von Hannover V Germany -Doglas v Hello -Peck v. UK -Wainwright v home office - In re S [2003] 3WLR 1425, 1451-1452 at paras 54 to 60 - Murray v. Big picture UK ltd - Max Mosley v. Nwes Group Newspaper limited - Mc Kennit v Ash -Google Earth v Switzerland -R v Secretary of state for home Department - Reyolds v Times Newspaper (those two between 1998-2000) - R v Shyler -Laporte case -Venables v News Group Newspaper - [2004] UKHL 47, [2005]1AC 593 -Night Jack case - A v B plc [2003] QB 195, 207 paras 11 (ix)and (x) - Attorney General v Guardian Newspaper -Hosking v Runting From my research i found these cases related I put it here just as an examples. *I would like you please to focus on ( Dr Paul Bernal from UEA university) opinions in his book about privacy, academic articles, or blog . * when you reference any information from anywhere make it easy to me to access, namely by mentioned the page or paragraph if it was from book or an article. *As resources please use academic, official, and trusted websites, cases, and blogs, more than book which I prefer you to don’t use more than 3. * divide the resources in reference list ( books, websites,…ect)