The case used in the calculations from the blood splatter lab goes to court. You are called to give evidence on you findings from the blood spatter.
What can you conclude from your finding and are the accused’s statements consistent with your findings?
Make certain you detail what it was from your analysis that brought you to your conclusions.
Is there another way to interpret your findings?
Would a mathematical error have changed what you "see"?
How could someone use the same data to prove a different case?