Confidentiality issue and public information.

  Watch the first segment of https://mediaplayer.pearsoncmg.com/assets/_video.true/civillit4e_confidentiality_issue_public_information and then answer the following: - Alicia is simply reading to Judy from the newspaper. Is Alicia violating any duties here if she doesn't work on the apple fritter case? - How about Judy? - Does it matter that they are in a public place? - Does your answer change for either Alicia or Judy if they were in the lunchroom inside the law office? - Before you watch the rest of the video, brainstorm a good response for Judy. What should she have said to Alicia? - After you watch the reset of the video, compare your solution with Judy's. Video Case Study #2 Questions: Watch https://mediaplayer.pearsoncmg.com/assets/paralegal-goldman6e_0135724546-Confidentiality_Issue_Need_to_Know_Circle up to the first narrator break and then answer the following: - Presuming Lisa works for the same law firm, but does not work on the apple fritter case, is Judy's conversation with Lisa a break of her duty of confidentiality? - Watch the second half of the clip and answer the same question as above. - Does is make any difference that Judy did not mention the client's name? Why or why not? Video Case Study #4 Questions: Watch the first segment of https://media.pearsoncmg.com/ph/streaming/careers/2013/mylegalstudieslab/Civil_Litigation/CL13_Confidentiality_Issue_Attorney_Client_Privilege.html where Alicia meets with Mr. Hutchinson, and then answer the following: - Does Alicia have an ethical problem based on what Mr. Hutchinson said during this meeting? Now watch the rest of the video and then answer the following: - Presuming that Mr. Hutchinson has admitted to committing fraud, is Alicia correct about the attorney-client privilege protecting her? - Does she become an accomplice when she obtains knowledge of a past crime? - Is a past crime confidential in Virginia? - Presuming that the information makes an interrogatory answer incorrect, what should she doe with this damaging information now?