Field Methods for International Health Planning and Evaluation

  Description: Assessment Task 2: Critiquing the logframe approach Value: 1596 Details of task: Based on concepts discussed in class, as well as you own independent research, you will be asked to critique the logframe approach to planning, monitoring and evaluation (1 ,500 words :I: 1096)- You critique should answer the question: What are three main benefits of the logframe approach for program planning, monitoring and evaluation? What are two major limitations of the logframe approach for planning, monitoring and evaluation, and what should be done to manage these limitations? In you critique, you are expected to consider some of the practical implications of adopting the logframe approach in the field in LMlC settings, including implications for program implementation- Criteria for marking: Assessment Task 2 will be marked out of 15 and assessed for content (5 marks), breadth (5 marks), and depth and critical argument (5 marks)- For Assessment Task 2, you are asked to write a short critique of the logical framework approach- You are expected to base this critique on concepts discussed in class, as well as you own independent research- You critique should aduess some of the practical implications of adopting the logframe approach in the field in low- and middle-income country settings- We expect that you critique will (raw on a minimum of 6 academic references-