Stakeholders can be individuals or associations that can have a direct or indirect effect in health care policy development. These are also termed interest groups. Interest groups and Stakeholders can have powerful influence on health policy improvement. Policies often are endorsed when stakeholders come together, having a vested interest. Some interests may be considered public or be of self-interest. When it involves public interest a specific course of action is followed based on data, information and community values. With self-interest the involvement may focus more with individuals or group interests. Both are equally important in generating debate with policy issues. The healthcare field has a mixture of significance stakeholders. One type of stakeholder is the interest group. Interest groups hold a common set of preferences on specific healthcare issues and seek to influence policy changes through public opinion. Some of the major stakeholders in health policy are consumers, patients, healthcare providers, health care establishments, insurers, payers, regulators, pharmaceutical manufacturers, research foundations, educational organizations and private businesses. For this assignment you are identify the Stakeholders in your policy project. In addition, you are to discuss how your proposition will affect the stakeholders. Which of the stakeholders are prospective supporters or opponents? This assignment should be typed and submitted before the deadline. The work for this assignment will be in partial completion of your final project. It should be written in Times New Roman, 12-font and double spaced in APA format for a total of 250 words or less. Please include any reference material. This is the policy Create a policy that triages every admit to your Oncology unit in order to insure they are cohorted with someone that doesn’t have an existing infection or history of. You’ll need to use evidence-based research for this but in the long run it should help prevent infection spread and decrease hospital length of stay. (That’s the theory behind it). please i need only 275 words no more than that
The current study has shed light on the role of stakeholders considered in the functioning of cancer patients. The current study has shed light on the cancer insurance policy that is considered to manage the health challenges that are faced by patients in critical health condition. The involvement of highly skilful practitioners is important to manage the valuable service provided by the staffs in health care setting. Policy makers have shed light on changes brought in the treatment process considered for this patients. Keen observation of the stakeholders that is care service users provides a scope to manage business process in strategic direction. Differences in opinion of large number of stakeholders create issues in managing the care quality system considered for patients existing in the health care setting (Drummond et al., 2015). The senior managers of the oncology department of large size health care setting considers the importance of including stakeholder policy that is required to manage monetary issues faced by users during the time of treatment. The use of strategic action plan is important to manage care policy system for insuring health problems of these individuals without any delay. The suggestion of stakeholder is considered in this context that is followed to bring changes in care policy that effects care service process considered in health care setting. The use of care intervention system is important to deal with the health challenges that affect care service process considered for users.
Drummond, M.F., Sculpher, M.J., Claxton, K., Stoddart, G.L. and Torrance, G.W., 2015. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. Oxford university press.
French, K.E., Guzman, A.B., Rubio, A.C., Frenzel, J.C. and Feeley, T.W., 2016, September. Value based care and bundled payments: Anesthesia care costs for outpatient oncology surgery using time-driven activity-based costing. In Healthcare(Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 173-180). Elsevier.
Ivers, N.M. and Grimshaw, J.M., 2016. Reducing research waste with implementation laboratories. The Lancet, 388(10044), pp.547-548.
Smith, E.J., MacLennan, S., Bjartell, A., Briganti, A., Knoll, T., Loch, T., Ribal, M.J., Sylvester, R., Van Poppel, H. and N’Dow, J., 2017. Ensuring Consistent European-Wide Urological Care by the Use of Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines: Can We Do Better?. Biomedicine Hub, 2(Suppl. 1), pp.9-9.