• Question #1: According to contemporary neuroscience studies, explain how, perhaps, Aristotle was right when he suggested that intellectual processes originated in the heart.
• Question #2: How did the case of Phineas Gage contribute to physical psychology?
Q2: The Case of Phineas Gage
The case of Phineas Gage made a monumental contribution to physical psychology by providing some of the first evidence that specific brain regions are responsible for specific functions, a concept known as localization of function.
Before Gage's accident, the prevailing view was that the brain functioned as a single, unified organ. However, after a tamping iron shot through Gage's left frontal lobe, his personality and behavior underwent a dramatic change. While his physical and cognitive abilities—such as memory and motor skills—remained largely intact, his once-polite, responsible demeanor was replaced by impulsive, irreverent, and profane behavior. His friends and acquaintances famously said he was "no longer Gage."
Gage's case demonstrated that damage to the frontal lobes, specifically, could profoundly alter personality, social behavior, and decision-making without affecting other intellectual faculties. This a landmark finding challenged the idea of a holistic brain and provided crucial evidence for the link between the frontal lobes and executive functions. This pioneering case laid the groundwork for the field of neuropsychology, inspiring future research and helping to establish a scientific understanding of the physical basis of personality and behavior.
Sample Answer
Q1: Aristotle and the Heart
Aristotle's view that intellectual processes originated in the heart may seem wrong today, but contemporary neuroscience offers a fascinating perspective that, in a way, supports his intuition about the heart’s importance. While the brain is the primary organ of intellect, the heart has its own complex network of neurons, sometimes called the "little brain in the heart" or the intrinsic cardiac nervous system (ICNS). This neural network can function independently of the brain and plays a significant role in regulating the heart's rhythm.
More importantly, there is a bidirectional communication between the heart and the brain. The heart sends more signals to the brain than the other way around. These messages influence the brain's centers for emotion management, cognitive processing, and decision-making. Studies on heart rate variability (HRV), which measures the time between heartbeats, show that heart rhythms are connected to our emotional states and mental clarity. A more coherent, or stable, heart rhythm is associated with improved emotional regulation and cognitive function. Therefore, while intellectual processes are not generated in the heart, its neural activity and the signals it sends to the brain are crucial for cognitive and emotional health, providing a modern scientific basis for Aristotle's heart-centered philosophy.