how to pay for college in a macroeconomics stand point.

c Order Description   how to pay for college in a macroeconomics stand point. i need it to argue the pros and cons of paying for college. here is the learning contract that can help guide you to write this paper. LEARNING ACTIVITIES introduced to macroeconomic principles as a part of learning and acquiring macro- and economic literacy, history, and analysis. The required (and recommended) texts are Slavin, Economics: A Self-Teaching Guide; Robert Heilbroner and Lester Thurow, Economics Explained; Swartz and Bonello, Taking Sides: Clashing Views on Controversial Economic Issues ; and Buchholz, New Ideas from Dead Economists. [Recommended text for background information: Jonathan Teller-Elsberg, Field Guide to the U. S. Economy, www.thenewpress.com.]You are encouraged to seek additional background material by researching on the Internet as you write your papers. College resources are available at esc.edu/library or other sites. To fulfill the General Education requirements, you must demonstrate an understanding of the methods economists use, develop hypotheses , work with data, and evaluate, employ, and interpret data. You must have knowledge of the models, methods, and issues of economic thought. The following sequence is recommended: First: You will study macroeconomic principles using the Slavin and Heilbroner and Thurow: Read concurrently. Keep a log of notes, quizzes, etc. in Slavin. Next, you will apply the principles and macro- and microeconomic thinking to the evaluation of macroeconomic issues. Select six issues from the macroeconomic and International Issues in Swartz and Bonello. Consider both sides of each issue as to how each will influence (enhance or retard) macroeconomic growth and macroeconomic efficiency. What are the economic incentives and disincentives behind each position. Write a "Memo to the President" brief on the six self-selected topics. Analyze the two points of view using the quotation on Ben Franklin's cost-benefit analysis: "[My] way is to divide half a sheet of paper by a line into two columns writing over one Pro, and over the other Con...I put down...short hints...for or against a measure. When I have thus got them all together in one view, I endeavor to estimate their respective weights;...thus proceeding, I find at length where the balance lies;...when...the whole lies before me, I think I can judge better, and am less liable to make a rash step." YES position   NO position PRO CON PRO CON Arguments Arguments Arguments Arguments Arguments Arguments Arguments Arguments Arguments, etc. Arguments, etc. Arguments, etc. Arguments, etc.   As you weigh the pro and the con positions, think about them with opportunity cost expectations in the forefront. Intuitively quantify the opportunity costs of your final recommendation. The most important learning experience of this course is the effort and thinking that goes into the examination of the arguments and opportunity costs of one position vs. the other. Don't settle for your first impressions! The four column grid is essential and must be amended to your brief. Based on how the pro and con measures come out, write six critical briefs (each 3-4 pages) recommending a Presidential policy or position. Your pro and con notes and analyses should become the basis for your work. The pro and con gird should be written into and be a highlight of each paper. For each side of the argument, analyze the outcomes upon each side/position on the economics of the national economy. affected. (Attach the grid to your essay.) Remember you are writing as an economic advisor, not a social worker, politician, interest group, bleeding heart, etc.. Note: Use the language of economics that you learned in Slavin and Heilbroner/Thurow, e.g. law of demand, law of supply, opportunity costs, marginal this and that, etc. to make your economic case. But, at the end of each paper, you may say how the positions taken on the issues might affect your own personal opinion, your job, your fiscal position, etc.. Can you find a common ground among the arguments? Economists can be divided into two campus: Normative and Positive Economists, ought-to-be versus as-it-is. You should develop and exercise your critical thinking and research abilities as you assess and weigh each issue from economic perspectives. Finally, write an eight page appraisal of our current macroeconomic health based on New Ideas From Dead Economists, and on how economists view our macroeconomy. In all seven papers, you should be keeping in mind the ideas, problems and solutions addressed in Slavin and Thurow: the efficiency of the firm or industry in macroeconomics and the role of government, (un)employment, growth in GNP(GDP), incomes, etc.