Leadership Theories Comparison Chart

Sample Solution

    Leadership Theories Comparison Chart Theory | Autocratic | Transformational | Servant Leadership --|--|--|-- Definition | A leadership style that focuses on a leader’s authority and control over their followers. The leader makes all decisions without input from the team and expects them to be followed without question. | A leadership style

that focuses on inspiring, motivating, and empowering others to strive for greatness while leading by example. It emphasizes communication between leaders and their teams in order to identify common goals which will ultimately lead to transformation within the team or organization. | A leadership approach based on “servant first” mentality, where the leader puts the needs of others before his own, thus helping individuals develop and grow as they work towards shared goals. Description | Autocratic leadership is focused primarily on task completion; this type of leader sets high standards but has little regard for individual feelings or opinions when making decisions. They are often seen as domineering because their focus is purely results-oriented rather than building relationships with those around them. This type of leader places more emphasis on ensuring compliance than fostering trust among employees or colleagues.| Transformational leaders prioritize both short-term results and long-term success for an organization; they focus not only on tangible outcomes but also intangible elements such as morale, motivation, teamwork, industry knowledge, etc., instead of simply focusing solely on productivity numbers—this helps create better engagement from team members who feel valued and respected by their leaders . In addition to this focus upon creating a unified culture within organizations , transformational leaders possess strong interpersonal skills which allows them to build lasting relationships with their teams through effective communication techniques – something autocratic styles lack. | Generally speaking, servant leaders tend to recognize importance placed upon collaboration between themselves and employees/teammates in order for tasks/projects can be achieved effectively – consequently creating a sense of mutual respect amongst colleagues working together towards shared objectives . Unlike authoritarian management methods , this particular style promotes an environment where ideas can be freely exchanged in an attempt to create an atmosphere conducive to open discussion & constructive problem solving (i.e., developing new solutions). Furthermore , these types of leaders usually prioritize learning & development opportunities for those under their supervision so that everyone involved can continue improving / expanding upon existing knowledge base pertaining given areas responsibility throughout duration project Strengths/ Advantages| Quick decision making; shorter timelines may result in faster completion times due potential lack consultation process . Additionally , it's believed certain situations may benefit from implementation quick action in absence consensus opinion ; especially during exigent circumstances involving security / safety concerns . || Leaders possessing transformational qualities have been associated increased engagement levels amongst subordinates thanks motivational capabilities enabling followers reach heights previously deemed impossible ; whilst simultaneously aligning organizational objectives with personal ambitions one another – thus creating sense unity purpose workplace environment .. Likewise , transformational strategies have proven successful cultivating long term loyalty amongst those directly impacted decisions made upper echelon management roles \\ Creates room openness dialogue thus fostering healthy relationship dynamics; allows teammates collaborate collectively devise solutions various issues tackling day day basis - due reliance each other expertise skill set outside chain command structure creates stronger bonds positive group dynamics encouraging creative thinking innovation \\ Offers opportunity reflect seek advice 'mentor' figure prior taking actions might negatively affect progress down line  \\ Enhances ability manage conflict more efficiently via means compromise settlement takes into account views respective parties involved dispute \\ Weaknesses/ Disadvantages| Leader doesn't take into account employee's thoughts nor does he allow any input —may result resentment frustration potentially lead low morale demotivation when feeling unheard ignored || Potential failure accurately gauge desired outcome level detail required complex process —due inadequate preparation planning || Lack understanding power delegation could limit scope activities being undertaken leading missed deadlines inability meet expectations imposed higher up chain command structure\\\\ Involves significant amount time dedication commitment ensure method successfully implemented maintained —therefore difficulty maintaining consistency inevitably occur if other pressing matters arise interfere scheduling