Under the “Moral Dilemmas” section on pages 10-11, Beauchamp and Childress offer a short overview of the Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California case (see endnote 16 on page 27). For Discussion Question #1, you should: (1) offer a brief re-description of the details of this case – specifically highlighting which prima facie norms were in conflict; and (2) offer a brief analysis of the majority opinion according to the six conditions that must be met to justify infringing one prima facie norm in order to adhere to another (see page 22-23).