Suppose that the CEO of a company is considering whether or not to stop paying for waste management services. If they stop paying for the services, the company will instead dump its hazardous chemicals and materials by a local stream, where they will wind up entering the local water supply. Should the CEO continue or stop paying for the waste management services? How would a utilitarian justify doing what you think the CEO should do? How would a Kantian justify it? Spend a significant portion of the paper stating why you think the utilitarian or Kantian justification is better than the other.'