Personality Psychology "Trait Theory"
1.List your percentile scores for each category as they appear on the site:
Open-Mindedness:
Conscientiousness:
Extraversion:
Agreeableness:
Negative Emotionality
2.The site producing the scores provides a descriptor for each score. Discuss a sentence that particularly stood out to you and why.
3.Utilizing at least one peer-reviewed resource, write a paragraph explaining the benefit of using personality testing in order to determine whether an individual should be employed in a specific job.
4.Utilizing at least one peer-reviewed resource, write a paragraph explaining the limitations of using personality testing in order to determine whether an individual should be employed in a specific job.
5.Imagine a situation where a person suddenly had access to the test results of a boyfriend/girlfriend. Explain why this person may have a strong desire to review the results of their significant other. Discuss what social and ethical problems could arise from seeing their results.
6.Discuss if we should know the personality profiles of our community leaders. Discuss what the public might gain or lose from having those profiles.
Sample Solution
Knowing the personality profiles of our community leaders could be beneficial for a number of reasons. It can help us better understand their motivations and decisions, as well as provide insight into how they may interact with different people and groups. Additionally, it can also give us an idea of how they will approach problem-solving and managing tensions within the community. Furthermore, by understanding the strengths and weaknesses of our leaders we can more easily identify areas where they may need additional support or guidance in order to effectively serve their constituents.
At the same time, there are also some potential downsides to knowing our leaders’ personality profiles. Revealing this information could open up opportunities for manipulation or coercion from outside interests seeking to influence policy or undermine public trust in certain individuals or initiatives. Moreover, revealing too much about a leader’s personality profile might create an atmosphere where differences between them are overemphasized rather than celebrated; leading to further divisions among members of the community instead of bringing them together.
From a social and ethical standpoint, revealing personal information regarding our public officials is not without risk – particularly if done without their consent. On one hand, it could lead to greater transparency and accountability on behalf of those in public office; however on the other hand it could also be used against them through unethical means such as blackmail or reputation damage campaigns if that data were mishandled or accessed inappropriately by someone with malicious intent. As such, any decision concerning what should be revealed must come after careful consideration given to all relevant factors including privacy rights, security concerns and respecting individual autonomy when it comes to such intimate matters pertaining to one’s identity.
Overall then while knowing more about our leaders' personality profiles can prove useful for getting a better sense of who these people are before we invest authority in them publicly there is still reason enough for caution when considering whether this should move beyond merely being something that each person chooses for themselves to disclose voluntarily – at least until stronger safeguards have been established for protecting both individual privacy as well as preventing misuse/abuse thereof by anyone looking exploit those details for questionable ends either external/internal actors alike