Poem Analysis

Discussion Board: The Research Process

1. Choose a poem we have read so far that you like and are intrigued by.
2. Use the library databases to find an article on that poem or on the poet who wrote it. It can be literary
   criticism (someone’s article about their interpretation of the poem) or biographical (details about the poet’s
   life and background). Don’t use an article about a different poem, though.
3. Read the article and highlight passages that you think are interesting, or that make good points. It’s okay
   if you don’t understand everything in the entire article – literary criticism can be challenging to read! Focus
   on the points that you do understand. If you feel like the entire article is confusing, choose a different one,
   though. No one wants you to feel lost and confused.
4. Write a brief paragraph (three or four sentences is great) about the poem or poet. Incorporate at least
   one quote from the poem and one quote from the article. Remember that quotes should be integrated into
   your own sentences. There’s an example below, but if you’d like more guidance on integrating quotations,
   click here for a link to the University of New Orleans’s article on quotation integration in research papers. If
   you’re not sure how to format your quote, click this link for the Purdue OWL guide.
5. Include internal citations for your quotations. Poems should be cited with author’s last name and a line
   number (line of the poem the quote comes from). Articles should be cited with author’s last name and a
   page number. There’s an example below, but if you need more help with internal citations, click this link for
   Purdue OWL’s guide to that.
6. Include a Works Cited list for your paragraph. It should include the poem and the article. Remember that
   the database can usually provide the citation in MLA format for you. For more help and examples of Works
   Cited page, click this link for the Purdue OWL guide to Works Cited pages.
   In Adrienne Rich’s poem “Aunt Jennifer’s Tigers,” the speaker describes her aunt Jennifer as “terrified” (9)
   and “mastered by” (10) conflicts in her life. The speaker’s description gives readers as much information
   about her, the niece, as it does about the aunt. As one scholar argues, the speaker is making “judgments”
   about Aunt Jennifer (Rizza 65). Jennifer is, after all, able to “flutter” (Rich 5) her hands to do needlework,
   though the speaker views her hands as being under the “massive weight” of a wedding band (Rich 7).
   Michael Rizza sees this description as “contradictory,” and attributes the symbolic weight of the ring to “the
   niece’s judgment more than actual description” (65). It is not clear that Aunt Jennifer feels as weighed down
   as her niece perceives her to be.