https://everyonesanauthor.tumblr.com/post/632618731756027904/conversation-athletes-activism-and-allyship
t’s not just that the stands are empty because of the pandemic (although they are). Pro sports stadiums,
ballparks, and arenas are sporting a very different look this year for another reason: social messaging. Four
years ago, NFL quarterback Colin Kaepernick was essentially “cancelled” by the league for his quiet protest;
today, every uniform, every scoreboard and playing field bears names and slogans meant to convey anti-racist
messages. League management and team owners are all on board now, but athletes are the ones leading the
way. This Conversation explores athletes, activism, and allyship from four perspectives. First, an essay by
Dave Zirin in the Nation examines corporate posturing. Next, Detroit Lions quarterback Matthew Stafford
shares a personal narrative of his feelings about football and politics from the Players’ Tribune. Comedian
Larry Wilmore interviews soccer star Megan Rapinoe for his TV show, Wilmore. And finally, Pew Research
Center senior writer and editor John Gramlich reports on Americans’ attitudes towards professional athletes
speaking out on political issues.
We suggest you read/watch all four pieces before responding to any of the questions.
QUESTIONS
- According to Dave Zirin, Naomi Osaka’s message “could not have been clearer.” What was her message?
State it briefly. Why might Osaka have thrown the question back at the reporter rather than simply answering
it? What is Zirin’s point in contrasting Osaka with the NFL? Does he make his point effectively? Explain your
reasoning. - Matthew Stafford relates a very personal narrative, disclosing feelings and experiences in an open and
humble way; towards the end of his essay he shifts from his first person account to directly address readers
who may have backgrounds similar to his or those who want athletes to “just shut up and play football.” What
does he want those readers to do? Do you think his narrative would persuade many of those readers to follow
his suggestion? Why or why not? Is it persuasive for you? Explain your response.