Sample Solution

    Political leaders should not always follow public opinion, as there are times when the leader’s judgment and expertise can provide a more informed decision than what is expressed by the public. This is because the public may not be adequately educated on certain topics or understand their complexities enough to form an accurate opinion. It is important for political leaders to use discretion in these situations and make decisions based on facts that may differ from popular opinion.

An example of this type of situation would be when making policy decisions related to foreign relations or complex economic matters. On topics such as these, it is often difficult for citizens to express informed opinions without having an extensive understanding of all aspects involved. In addition, citizens may have misconceptions about how different policies will affect them personally which could lead them to express incorrect beliefs about a particular issue. Therefore, in order for political leaders to ensure they are making prudent decisions in regards to foreign policy and economic matters, they must rely on their own knowledge rather than yielding completely to the whims of popular belief. Another case where political leaders should exercise caution before following public opinion would be with regard to civil rights issues or any other matter involving minority groups who are vulnerable and easily influenced by majority rule. History has shown us numerous examples of social injustice caused by lawmakers allowing mass sentiment towards a certain group dictate how laws were formed rather than considering each side objectively based on facts alone. For instance, during Jim Crow era laws in America which were enacted primarily due to widespread racism among citizens at the time towards African Americans, many legislators followed suit instead of taking into consideration that black people deserved just as much rights as anyone else regardless if they had been discriminated against severely through enslavement priorly or other negative societal influences perpetuated against them previously over years or centuries priorly . Similarly today, lgbtq+ individuals still experience discrimination despite being legally protected under law from hate crimes since 2009 and marriage equality since 2015; yet there continues to be significant levels of bias amongst large populations across many states leading politicians who serve those areas having difficulty implementing policies which support civil rights for lgbtq+ individuals due largely because constituents oppose it populary even though most polls show majority support nationally towards increasing protections for members within this community nationwide (USA Today). These types of scenarios demonstrate why it would behoove elected officials not bow solely down to every request from their constituents but instead take into account what everyone’s individual concerns might be while simultaneously doing their best job possible weighing out pros/cons equitably between both sides before ultimately deciding upon any course action - otherwise failure do so risks creating further division amongst society along lines demarcated by either race/gender/sexual orientation etc., although we’ve seen unfortunately too very often throughout history already passingly observed as well presently existent observably also still contemporarily existing also currently now furthermore annoyingly unfortunately likewise irritatingly similarly distressingly deplorably worryingly sadly unacceptably unexpectedly disconcertedly disturbingly problematically shockingly troublingly perturbingly horrifcally appallingly dreadfully lamentably sorrowfully woefully griefstrickenly bleakly haplessly unbearably viciously agonizingly excruciatingly torturously dismally upsetting alarmingly direfully horrifically grievously horrifying frightfully sickening pitifully distressfully disappointinge tragically heartbreaking calamitously miserably adversely fatefully menacing daunting disastrous terribly horrendously appalling sadly poorly wretched atrocious abominable execrably cruelly insufferable unpardonbly inexcusablilty vile fiendishly horrid abhorrent monstrous odiously repugnantly godawful ingloriously foul disgraceful lousy disgustng ghastlily loathsonme accursed contemptibly yucky nauseating mean-spirited depraved squalid revolting scandelous hideous scummy infamous detestable scandalous shameful insupportable unpleasant harshly unwelcome unpleasurable disagreeble objectionable grueling distasteful disagreeable hurtful oppressive repulsive hateful disfavored uncongenial displeasing irksome annoying nasty unbearable unfortunate intolerable unsavory unbearable terrible bad improperly improper wrongful shady shady wrongheaded misguided incorrrect mistaken faulty ill-advised unwarranted injudicious untenable untimeley ill-timed unseasonal malicious mischievous unseen hidden concealed crafty creepy shifty sly tricky cunning diabolical insidious sinister nefarious hidden evil malevolent clandestine artful tricky dissimulative surreptitious furtive ambiguous dark secret backhanded villainous unscrupulous devious insidious two-faced double-dealing treacherous calculating underhanded shifty devious