Review the attached Case Study II, "Russian Disinformation: Lessons Learned From the MH17 Shootdown" in Pherson & Pherson, 321-339.
- Drawing only from the case study, what evidence can you identify that the Russian counternarrative is deceptive? Are there any elements of their response that you would have found convincing at the time?
- Which of the internet sources used in this case study seem suspicious to you? Are there any sources you would judge to be convincing?