Supervisory Theory and Practice

Supervisory Theory and Practice Assignment #4: Differentiated Supervisory/Evaluation Plan (Presentation and written paper constructed students, 35 points, Select one of the following and review available resources and literature to learn the current position of those researching and writing in the field. To deepen your insight and understanding of your groups chosen topic, include in your paper references and comments from in-depth interviews with experienced administrators whom you believe to be knowledgeable in this area. Your group will present your findings in a 6-8-page paper due in module eight. 1.    Supervision and evaluation of educational administrators:  What systems are seen in the field and how effective are they? What is done well? What is left unattended? Make sure to include in your search the use of mentoring and performance-based appraisal systems. Does the School Board have any responsibilities in this area? Focus your search on administrative positions that do not have classroom responsibilities:  principals and their assistants; directors of operations and of finance; superintendents and their assistants. Then based on your research and interview, construct a supervisory/evaluation plan that your group thinks best meets the needs of the administrators in your school or district. 2.    Teacher supervision in a true “learning community”:  What would it look like? What are some of the “cutting edge” teacher supervision/evaluation systems out there? What benefits are being gained in schools where they are in use? Then based on your research and interviews, construct a supervisory/evaluation plan that your group thinks best meets the needs of the teachers in your school or district. Rubric Assignment #4 – Differentiated Supervision/Evaluation Plan Select one of the topics in the syllabus and review available resources and the literature to learn the current position of those researching and writing in the area chosen. Submit a 6 - 8 - p age summary of your results. This can be done as a group. Due Week 8 Name: Date: Criteria for Evaluation: total points available= 35 points Needs Improvement Meets Exceeds Comments and Points Narrative overview of the supervision plan 6 Narrative is weak or does not clearly address the supervisory process in the plan. 8 Narrative adequately addresses the processes but needs further explanation of the expected outcomes of the plan. 10 Narrative clearly and effectively addresses the proc esses and the expected outcomes of the plan. Interview / application to the supervision plan 6 Summary is weak in explaining the interview application to plan. 8 Summary adequately explains the interview application to plan. 10 Summary clearly and effect ively explains the interview application to plan. Presentation of how the plan links to the current literature 6 Explanation is weak or does not deepen insight and understanding of how the plan links to the literature. 8 Explanation adequately provide s understanding of how the plan links to the literature. 10 Explanation provides deep insight and clear, well - developed understanding of how the plan links to the literature. Paper: Grammar, Spelling. APA style. 3 Paper has numerous grammatical and/or spelling errors and does not follow APA format. 4 Paper has 2 - 4 grammatical and/or spelling errors and lacks some APA format. 5 Paper is free of grammatical and spelling errors and clearly follows APA style and format. Total points awarded=__ PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT :)