CLO1: Critically analyze the internal and external environment of business firms using different analytical tools (SWOT analysis, TOWS analysis Porter’s 5 Forces, Steeple-Pest analysis and CAPM)
Prepare Strategic Audit Report of the following Companies: Rubric for grading is attached.
Team Text book Case
Andrews Tesla
Baldwin Wallace group
Digby Uber
Chester Toms shoes.
Please Note the following special instructions:
- The groups should check their submission in Turnit-in in Moodle to prevent plagiarism.
- The typed report should not exceed five pages (A4 size) single line space (excluding Appendix which contains tables). For every additional page of text, 2 marks will be deducted.
- Please ensure the report is free from mistakes in spellings, communication, grammar etc., to avoid further deductions indicated in the rubric.
ASSESSMENT RUBRIC FOR PREPARING INDIVIDUAL /GROUP REPORT AND PRESENTATION
SEC CONTENT CLO assessed Max Marks STUDENT’S PERFORMANCE Actual Marks Moder-ator’s Marks
Below expected Met expectation Exceeded expectation
< 80% (E1) 80-90% (E2) >90%
(E3)
I ORGANIZATION & PRESENTATION OF REPORT 1 35%
a. Length of report-Maximum 5 pages (excluding tables) 10%
b. Organization & Structure of report (based on Strategic Audit Format)
- Paper has followed the strategic audit format
- The paper follows the assignment requirements/directions
- The paper uses paragraphs properly
10%
5
3
2
c. Communication style & grammar
- The paper is clearly written using language appropriate for the assignment
- The paper contains few grammatical or punctuation errors (< 1-3 per page)
- The paper contains few spelling errors (< 1-3 per page) 15%
5
5
5
II. CONTENT (A+B+C) 65%
A. Strategic Planning
a. Discussed current performance & Mission 1 10%
b. Presented EFAS matrix and discussed? 1 10%
c. Presented IFAS Matrix and discussed ? 1 10%
B. Presented Key (Strategic) Factors? (SFAS)
- The writer demonstrates full knowledge of the subject
- The writer responds fully to the issues raised in the assignment cover sheet
- The writer provides relevant and cogent analysis
- Ideas are well developed
- The analysis is supported by the arguments presented 1 15%
2
4
3
3
3
C. Discussed Strategic alternatives? 1 20%
Total (I+ II) 100%