Translation Science Project

Guidelines PURPOSE The purpose of this applicationis to provide the student an opportunity to develop a translation science project from the perspective of nursing informatics. COURSE OUTCOMES This assignment provides documentation of student ability to meet the following course outcomes: CO3: Articulate the relationships between translation science, information technology, and evidence-based practice (PO #7). CO4: Differentiate knowledge management issues in nursing informatics (PO #7). POINTS This assignment is worth a total of 250 points. REQUIREMENTS 1. To complete this application, you will need access to the following databases: CINAHL, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and the Joanna Briggs Institute. You may access these databases through the Chamberlain College of Nursing Online Library. 2. The Translation Science projectis worth 250 points and will be graded on quality of information, use of citations, use of Standard English grammar, sentence structure, and overall organization based on the required components as summarized in the directions and grading criteria/rubric. 3. Create your report using Microsoft Word 2007 (a part of Microsoft Office 2007). You can tell that the document is saved as a MS Word 2007 document because it will end in “.docx” 4. Follow the directions and grading criteria closely. Any questions about this project may be posted under the Q&A Forum. 5. The length of the project report is to be no less than 6 and no greater than 8 pages excluding title page and reference pages. 6. APA format is required with both a title page and reference page. Use the required components of the review as Level 1 headings (upper and lower case, centered, boldface): Note: Introduction – Write an introduction to a selected advanced nursing practice translation science topic, but do not use “Introduction” as a heading in accordance with the rules put forth in the Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (2010, p. 63).APA format is required with both a title page and reference page. Use the required components of the review as Level 1 headers (upper and lower case, centered): a. Description of selected advanced nursing practice translation of evidence into practice (both integrative and systematic review of evidence) b. Presentation of selected advanced practice translation of evidence analysis with proposed management (structure-process-outcomes) for information systems change c. Conclusion PREPARING THE PROJECT REPORT The following are best practices for preparing this project report: 1. When introducing the selected advanced practice translation science topic, be sure to include pertinent background information regarding the evidence (who, what, where, when, and why). 2. When describing the selected translation of evidence topic, be sure to fully identify and address evidence using a synthesis (integrative review citing areas of agreement and disagreement among authors) approach for the written summary and attach an evidence table (systematic review citing leveling and grading of evidence) using the template found in Doc Sharing. 3. When presenting the selected advanced nursing practice translation of evidence analysis, be sure to fully address proposed management (structure-process-outcomes) for information systems change and the informatics role of the DNP-prepared nurse in evaluation and sustainability. DIRECTIONS AND GRADING CRITERIA Category Points % Description Introduction to selected advanced nursing practice translation science topic 20 8 Introduces the selected advanced nursing practice translation science topicand includes pertinent background information regarding the evidence (who, what, where, when, and why). Description of selected advanced nursing practice translation of evidence topic 100 40 Identifies and addresses all aspects of selected evidence using a synthesis (integrative review citing areas of agreement and disagreement among authors) approach for the written summary and attach an evidence table (systematic review citing leveling and grading of evidence) using the template found in Doc Sharing. Presentation of selected advanced practice translation of evidence analysis 100 40 Addresses proposed management (structure-process-outcomes) for information systems change and the informatics role of the DNP in evaluation and sustainability. Uses examples from current evidence that support assertions and relevant examples from advanced practice. Conclusion 10 4 An effective conclusion identifies the main ideas and major conclusions from the body of your report. Minor details are left out. Summarize the benefits of the translation science project to advanced practice nursinginformation systems change. Clarity of writing 15 6 Use of standard English grammar and sentence structure. No spelling errors or typographical errors. Organized around the required components using appropriate headers. APA format 5 2 All information taken from another source, even if summarized, must be appropriately cited in the report (including citation of interview) and listed in the references using APA (6th ed.) format: 1. Document setup 2. Title and reference pages 3. Citations in the text and references. Total: 250 100 A quality report will meet or exceed all of the above requirements. GRADING RUBRIC Assignment Criteria Meets Criteria Partially Meets Criteria Does Not Meet Criteria Introduction to selected advanced nursing practice translation science topic (20 pts.) Excellent introduction of translation science topic. Rationale is well presented and purpose fully developed. 18–20 points Basic understanding and/or limited explanation of translation science topic and/or inappropriate emphasis. 13–17 points Little or very general introduction oftranslation science topic. Little to no explanation; inappropriate emphasis. 0–12 points Description of selected advanced nursing practice translation of evidence topic (100 pts.) Comprehensiveselection of evidence. Synthesis summary in paper and leveling and grading of evidence is provided in attached evidence table. 90–100 points Limitedselection and synthesis of evidence. Either level of evidence or quality of evidence is omitted. 70–89 points Little or very general selection and synthesis of evidence. Both level of evidence and quality of evidence are omitted. 0–69 points Presentation of selected advanced nursing practice translation of evidence analysis (100 pts.) Excellent discussion of management (structure-process-outcomes)for information systems change and role of DNP-prepared nurse in evaluation/sustainability. 90–100 points Basic discussion of management (structure-process-outcomes) for information systems change and role of DNP-prepared nurse in evaluation/sustainability. 70–89 points Little or very general discussion of management (structure-process-outcomes) for information systems change, or missing discussion of role of DNP-prepared nurse in evaluation/sustainability. 0–69 points Conclusion (10 pts.) Excellent understanding of information systems change and SPO. Conclusions are well evidenced and fully developed. 9–10 points Basic understanding and/or limited application of information systems change and SPO and/or inappropriate emphasis on an area. 7–8 points Little understanding of informationsystems change and SPO. Little to no explanation; inappropriate emphasis on an area. 0–6 points Clarity of writing (15 pts.) Excellent use of standard English showing original thought. No spelling or grammar errors. Well organized with proper flow of meaning. 14–15 points Some evidence of own expression and competent use of language. No more than three spelling or grammar errors. Well organized thoughts and concepts. 11–13 points Language needs development. Four or more spelling and/or grammar errors. Poorly organized thoughts and concepts. 0–10 points APA format (5 pts.) APA format correct with no more than 1–2 minor errors. 4–5 points 3–5 errors in APA format and/or 1–2 citations are missing. 2–3 points APA formatting contains multiple errors and/or several citations are missing. 0–1 points Total Points Possible = points