Wall, Feary, and Your View

      Part One: Discuss a case from one of the emailed articles* involving co-workers where the actions of one would constitute sexual harassment (not sexual assault) according to both Wall AND Feary. (Make sure to explain Wall's four conditions and Feary's criteria as well and to cite the pages numbers for the key parts of each of their views). Part Two: Discuss a different case from the emailed articles* where the actions of one would be considered sexual harassment by Feary but NOT by Wall. Part Three: In the case that you discuss in part two, with whom do you agree, Wall OR Feary? Explain why you agree with one AND why you disagree with the other. Part Four Would Werhane and Radin/Anderson agree with the reasons behind your view or not? Explain drawing on their discussions and/or criticisms of the doctrine of employment at will and related issues.