West influenced Yeltsin's decision making post the dissolution of the USSR.

Sample Solution

  Boris Yeltsin’s decision making in the years following the dissolution of the Soviet Union was heavily influenced by Western ideas and political forces. In particular, Russia had to contend with foreign powers such as the United States, European countries, and international organizations that promoted their own ideals and agendas.

During his time in power from 1991 onwards, Yeltsin pushed for greater cooperation between Russia and other nations in areas such as commerce, politics and culture. His efforts included signing a series of agreements with NATO known as the Partnership for Peace initiative which saw Russia join in joint military exercises and partake in peacekeeping missions alongside Western militaries. He also worked to promote economic ties between Russia and its neighbours; this included membership into international financial institutions such as the International Monetary Fund (IMF) where he secured billions of dollars worth of loans to help stabilise Russian finances during a period of hyperinflation. This resulted in further integration into global markets through trade deals like G7-Russia Financial Summit held in 1993 which established closer links with major western economies like Germany, France and Britain. Yeltsin’s domestic policies were heavily shaped by western liberal values too; he embraced capitalism over communism, supported free speech rights for citizens regardless of their background or political convictions (to an extent). His government worked towards introducing democratic reforms such as parliamentary elections whereby individuals could directly elect their representatives instead of relying on party loyalty alone. Furthermore, he sought to introduce measures designed to protect minority groups from discrimination based on gender or ethnicity along with initiatives aimed at securing basic human rights within Russian borders – both principles traditionally associated with western liberal democracy systems albeit not implemented successfully under Yeltsin’s rule due to lacklustre implementation or limited efficacy amongst other factors. Overall then it is clear that post-Soviet Yeltsin's policy decisions were largely informed by what was happening outside its borders rather than within them – many reforms looked distinctly western while even relatively innocuous acts like encouraging increased contacts between Russians abroad showed how eager he was to adopt new norms popularised by foreign counterparts whether they be governments or non-governmental organisations alike; this meant changes sometimes appeared rushed or incompletely thought out but ultimately opened up doors for future generations who would benefit from these early steps towards building better ties across geopolitical divides worldwide.