Whose arguments do you feel would be more receptive by northerns? Southerners? Why? Conversely,

  read the words of and about several abolitionist in Unit 4 (Topic 13). Whose arguments do you feel would be more receptive by northerns? Southerners? Why? Conversely, whose arguments do you feel would be least receptive by northerners? Why?   No cover page needed- Single space. 1 page- Only two primary sourm is required. Secondary sources is unlimited- include the rule of 3 to support the questions above. Followed by 3 or more paragraph that supports the rule of 3 from thesis- No outside source.-. only primary and secondary source provided by the course- Only use secondary sources located in Link to Corbett on the left of the page (Chap 12 and 13), lecture (from Part II, unit 4, topics 13 subtopics: North and South) and primary sources found under each Subtopics: Noted as " READINGS: Primary Sources" also more primary sources are provided under Angelia grimke and abolition- My thought: either militant abolitionist such as David walker (who was against colonization), William Lloyd Garrison who suggested north abrogate, Or the feminist like Crimke and Lydia Maria child who realized they share the same restriction as colored- I favor the Grimke sisters- elearn.uta.edu Coursezu-S history 1311 Click tab for course materials Link for electronic textbook is located at "link to Corbett text online" PS I provided the info just in case my preferred writer is not available.