Physical crime and the computer crime from the standpoint of substantive law
Compare the physical crime and the computer crime from the standpoint of substantive law. What crimes did Fred commit when he entered the jewelry store with a gun and ordered the store clerk to hand over the jewelry? How serious are those crimes? What harms did Fred Cause? Why should the law deter such activity, and why was it morally culpable? 300 words
Sample Solution
From the standpoint of substantive law, physical crime and computer crime are very different. Physical crime involves a physical act, such as theft or assault, while computer crimes involve the manipulation or misuse of computers or digital devices to commit fraud or other illegal activities.In this example, Fred committed robbery when he entered the jewelry store with a gun and ordered the store clerk to hand over the jewelry. This is one of the most serious types of criminal offenses since it involves violence and threats of harm against an individual in order to take something from them. The harms that Fred caused include fear on behalf of both himself and the victims (the clerk), potential injury if either party resisted, and financial losses due to stolen goods.
The law should deter such activity because it violates fundamental principles regarding consent in relation to property rights. When one person takes something from another without their permission – whether through force or intimidation – they have committed an injustice by depriving someone else of their right to choose freely how they use their resources. Furthermore, it is morally culpable because Fred has infringed upon someone else's autonomy by disregarding their wishes without regard for any repercussions that his actions may bring onto them — either physically or emotionally — making him accountable for any wrongs done during his offense.