Finkelstein’s historical argument on Jerusalem

Summarize Finkelstein’s historical argument on Jerusalem under David and Solomon. Did his argument persuade you? Why or why not? Why do you think his interpretation has elicited strong opposition?
Please use correct citations and quotes from the reading provided. ONLY USE THE LINK THAT IS PROVIDED AND ONLY THESE CHAPTERS.
This is the link to the chapter: https://umb.umassonline.net/bbcswebdav/pid-2999628-dt-content-rid-22447630_1/courses/B2830-4045/Finkelstein_Solomon%20Golden%20Age.pdf

This question has been answered.

Get Answer