Andrew Beetham, in his article “Body modification: a case of modern maiming?” J. Crim. L. 2018, 82(3), 206-208, analyses and critically evaluates whether it is possible to consent to an assault, in general, and whether, in particular, the practise of body modification by a tattoo artist can be lawful. Briefly identify the key arguments advanced by Mr Beetham, and, giving reasons, discuss whether his critical evaluation of the key concepts is persuasively argued. State whether you agree with his conclusion, giving reasons.
Introduction (250 words)
Briefly identify the key arguments advanced by Mr Beetham (500 words)
Discuss whether his critical evaluation of the key concepts is persuasively argued giving reasons (1250 words)
State whether you agree with his conclusion giving reasons (750 words)
No because it should be criminalised (Brown and BM)
Conclusion (250 words)