SHOCK OF THE NOW: GLOBAL ART SINCE 1900

  1. As a recent exhibition on photography at the Rijksmuseum noted, “This new and
    magical medium [photography] caused a revolutionary shift away from the styles of
    imagery people were accustomed to seeing in paintings, drawings or engravings.
    Photography introduced an entirely new way of seeing and representing reality.”
    Discuss the statement using 3-4 photographic examples to support your argument.
  2. Is the concept of the ‘avant-garde’ of genuine use in describing the history of later
    nineteenth-century French art, or is it an artificial imposition based on prejudices
    about the value of ‘modernism’? In your reply consider at least one pairing of diverse
    artists, such as Edgar Degas and Vincent Van Gogh, Puvis de Chavannes and Paul
    Gauguin, Eugène Delacroix or Georges Seurat.
  3. Using 3 to 4 examples of artworks, by artists either Dada and Surrealism, explain how
    the horrors of the First World War resulted in avantgarde art that broke new
    conceptual and aesthetic ground.
  4. Surrealism had broad appeal beyond Central Europe to Eastern Europe, Latin
    America and the Asia Pacific for example. Select two or three examples from the
    lectures or beyond to discuss the ways in which artists beyond Central Europe drew
    on and expanded the various tropes of the unconscious, desire, chance or fetish to
    incorporate local or biographical narratives.
  5. Some modernist artists were influenced by and engaged with the new sciences such
    as the fourth dimension, mathematics, or Einstein’s concept of space and time. Others
    were equally enthralled by spiritual ideals, Eastern philosophies or drawn to the
    aesthetics of other cultures. Using examples from 2-3 artists focus your essay on one
    of these areas (such as Marcel Duchamp, László Moholy-Nagy, Pablo Picasso or
    Natalya Goncharova). Explain how the artist/s engaged with these ideas and how you
    may trace this in their artworks.
  6. You are an art collector in Berlin during the Weimar Republic 1919-1933. You love the
    night life, theatres and galleries, and the intellectual debates in the Einstein Café with
    writers, artist and thinkers such as Walter Benjamin, Max Beckmann, Hannah Höch,
    Bertolt Brecht. You hear that the National Socialists (Nazis) are seizing artworks from
    the national galleries for an exhibition of what they call degenerate art in Munich, and
    you travel there to see the exhibition firsthand. As an engaged collector and supporter
    of modernism, describe why the Nazis deemed these works unsuitable for the German
    people and how was this conveyed in the exhibition? Use up to four examples of
    artists/artworks in your essay.
  7. It is the post-war 1950s and 60s in New York and the Cold War is in full swing in what
    is known as the Atomic Age. Life is good, and as a up and coming young artist you
    hang out downtown with artists like Jackson Pollock, Mark Rothko, Helen
    Frankenthaler, Willem de Kooning, Barnett Newman, Theodore Stamos, Robert
    Rauschenberg, Ad Reinhardt and others. Despite some success the artists feel the
    political and social pressures of the threat of an atomic war, anti-communist
    sentiment, and fear of persecution. The artists response is to reinvent art and turn not
    to representation, but to abstraction, exploring the self, inner emotions,
    transcendence, and the psyche. Discuss this turn from the ‘crisis of representation’
    through 3-4 examples exploring either Abstract Expressionism or Colour Field
    painting.
  8. Pop art radically transformed the modern art landscape. Yet its methodology has not
    escaped criticism. Some regarded it as a dumbing down of art – a shallow, antiintellectual appropriation of advertising and mass media that ultimately succumbs to
    the economy of commercialism. Yet it has also been praised for its critical subversion
    of mass culture – a valuable breakdown of low and high culture as a means to reassess our relationship to the everyday world around us and challenge the very
    hierarchy, and definition, of art. Discuss this argument, exemplifying both sides to
    which ever degree you agree with, through reference to no more than 3-4
    artists/artworks.
  9. “The personal as the political” is an emblem of the feminist movement of the
    1960s/70s. Discuss how feminist artists took up the charge of challenging patriarchal
    systems, gender stereotypes, or the lack of representation of women in the art world.
    How did their own personal expression help address these broader political issues in
    order to, in artist Suzanne Lacy’s words, “influence cultural attitudes and transform
    stereotypes.” How also may they have done this through new and innovative
    approaches to art, such as performance, photomedia or textiles. Select up to 3 artists
    and focus your argument through one or more of these points.
  10. After World War II, many communist countries embraced a distinctive concept of
    “realism,” known as “socialist realism,” that differed from predominant conceptions
    of realism in capitalist countries. By the 1970s and 80s, as artists in communist Cuba
    and China began to experiment with forms related to Western modernism, they had
    to stake out a position in relation to socialist realism. Select two or three artists from
    Cuba and/or China whose work grappled with the opposition between modernism
    and socialist realism. In what ways did these artists treat the two traditions as
    irreconcilable opposites, and in what ways did they try to synthesize them?
  11. How do Indigenous artists problematise historical narrative and what are the gains of
    this exercise? Discuss in relation to one or two Indigenous artists whose work
    interrogates historical narratives through archival research.
  12. In his essay, “What is Digital Cinema?,” film theorist Lev Manovich argues that “digital
    media redefines the very identity of cinema.” (Manovich’s essay can be found online
    at http://reframe.sussex.ac.uk/post-cinema/1-1-manovich/) What is the nature of the
    digital cinematic image in the twenty-first century? How can digital cinema be
    understood as both a continuation of, as well as a radical break with, its earlier history?
    Explore Manovich’s statement with reference to at least one digital and one predigital cinematic film (such as Children of Men, Gravity or Orson Welles’ opening of
    Touch of Evil).
  13. Why and how have issues of identity dominated recent art practice? Select ONE of
    the following ‘identity issues’ for your discussion: culture and/or race, sexuality and/or
    gender. Refer to no more than 3-4 specific art works in your discussion.
  14. You come across an old Science Major friend at the Manning Bar. They are depressed
    about their recent failed exam/romantic breakup/dead lab rat. You want to jolt them
    out of their pessimistic stupor through exposure to contemporary artistic wonder.
    Where do you take them, and why? Make sure your conceptual and art historical rigor
    matches your friendly enthusiasm.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer