Appendix H needs to be filled out: no paper written, the literature review is just completing appendix H.
Please use the below sources to complete appendix H link here: https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/evidence-based-practice/_docs/appendix_h_synthesis_recommendation.pdf
Here is a link for information on how to complete appendix H: https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/evidence-based-practice/_images/EBP%20Tool%20Samples/2017_Appendix%20H%20Evidence%20Synthesis%20and%20Recommendation%20Tool_Page_1.png
Here are some instruction on completing the synthesis:
This week, you will synthesize the evidence in your tables. This week’s
EBP video (Links to an external site.)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cs9sgquUupw&feature=youtu.be
and article, “The process of synthesis: seeing similarities and differences across the body of evidence” (Fineout-Overholt, 2010), walk you right through the steps. The synthesis table you will use to organize your evidence is the Johns Hopkins Appendix H. On this Appendix, you will take a macroscopic view or all your studies. Consider the strength of the evidence, the quality of the evidence, and the applicability of the evidence. These three elements determine your confidence to make a practice change implementation decision.
In this week’s discussion, you will post a draft of your Appendix H and tell your classmates what translational pathway you are going to choose based on the evidence. There are four possible pathways, · Strong, compelling evidence, consistent results: solid indication for a practice change. · Good and consistent evidence: consider pilot of change or further investigation. · Good but conflicting evidence: no indication for practice change; consider further investigation for new evidence or develop a research study. · Little or no evidence: no indication for practice change; consider further investigation for new evidence or develop a research study or discontinue the project.
Sources:
- Boamah, S. A., & Laschinger, H. (2016). The influence of areas of work-life fit and work‐life interference on burnout and turnover intentions among new graduate nurses. Journal of Nursing Management, 24(2), E164-E174.
- Flinkman, M., Isopahkala-Bouret, U. & Salantera, S. (2013). Young registered nurses’ intention to leave the profession and professional turnover in early career: A qualitative case study. ISRN Nursing, 12(3), 1 – 12.
- Huynh, C., Bowles, D., Yen, M. S., Phillips, A., Waller, R., Hall, L., & Tu, S. P. (2018). Change implementation: the association of adaptive reserve and burnout among inpatient medicine physicians and nurses. Journal of interprofessional care, 32(5), 549-555. doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2018.1451307
- Luan, X., Wang, P., Hou, W,m Chen, L. & Lou, F. (2017). Job stress and burnout: A comparative study of senior and head nurses in China. Nursing and Health Sciences, 19(3), 163 – 169.
- Mudallal, R., Othman, W. & Hassan, N. (2017). Nurses’ burnout: The influence of leader empowering behaviors, work conditions and demographic traits. Inquiry, 21(3), 12 – 26.
- Baruah, A., Das, S., Dutta, A., Das, B., Sharma, T., & Hazarika, M. (2019, April). Degree and factors of burnout among emergency healthcare workers in India. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6502256/