Article Analysis

Write an analysis article and summarize the concise answers to the questions listed at the end

Recommended FrameworkSWOT:/Positioning/Fit/Generic/BMC

APPENDIX A: Case Study Analysis: Tips and Tools
Tip 1. Contextualize the case. There is a method to my madness. Cases generally correspond to a particular set of concepts and theories. Keep this in mind as you prepare your analysis.
Tip 2. Read the case actively. The goal is not for you to grab your highlighter and speed through the case. Instead, ask yourself questions, wrestle with the core decisions, and think through multiple scenarios.
Tip 3+. William Ellet argues that there are “four types of situations” that you will often see in cases, for each here are some tips:

  • Problems
    o Define the problem in the case. This may not be obvious.
    o Then, be able to diagnosis the problem using the various tools you’ve acquired
    throughout your business training.
  • Decisions
    o Identify the decision options.
    o Determine the criteria by which to evaluate the decision options.
    o Accumulate as much evidence as possible to support your decision.
  • Evaluations
    o Again, determine the appropriate evaluative criteria.
    o Make the evaluation that is most consistent with the evidence provided by the
    case and the key criteria.
    o Be sure to be holistic in your evaluations – think about positive and negative
    aspects.
  • Rules (This is particularly critical for quantitative analyses)
    o Know the information you need to apply a rule (For example, what data is necessary for a break-even or NPV analysis)
    o Know how to obtain this information. o Know how to apply the rule.
    o Make sure your data is accurate.
    Tools
    Ellet provides a nice model for analyzing cases. There are five key phases of the process.
  1. Situation
    a. Figure out the big picture first; ask yourself, “What is the situation in the case?
    What is going on here? 2. Questions
    a. Develop questions about the problem, namely:
    i. What do you need to know about the situation?
    b. Think through issues related to the decision, namely:
    i. What are the decision options? Any seem particularly strong or weak? What is at stake here? What are the key criteria to base your decision?
    c. Questions about the evaluation, in particular:
    i. Who or what is being evaluated? Who is responsible for the evaluation?
  2. Hypothesis
    a. Here is where your analytical work gains momentum. Develop your perspective
    on the case.
    b. Review the aforementioned questions – now begin to develop your answers for
    each set of questions. 4. Proof and Action
    a. Ask yourself, what evidence is provided by the case that supports my hypothesis? What additional evidence do I need to collect?
    b. Equally important for our course, also consider how would I implement my recommendations?
  3. Alternatives
    a. Spend some time critiquing yourself, ask the following:
    i. How else could this problem be defined? If defined differently, would I have the same hypothesis?
    ii. Where are the weak links in my analysis?
    iii. What is the potential downside to my recommended decision? What is the
    strongest counterevidence?
    iv. How thorough have I been in my analysis? How might a different course
    of action be proved?

APPENDIX B: Case Analysis Questions
You are responsible for submitting a written analysis for any six of the cases. Your analysis should be submitted electronically via Blackboard.
A papers (A, A-) will thoroughly address all listed questions and demonstrate full comprehension of the material.
B papers (B+, B, B-) will thoroughly address all but one question and demonstrate a high level of comprehension of the material.
C papers (C+, C, C-) will thoroughly address only one question and demonstrate some level of comprehension of the material.
D papers (D+, D, D-) only addresses one question and fails to demonstrate comprehension of the material.

Google, Inc. in 2014 –

  1. Google currently enjoys approximately 70% market share of US searches, and well above 90% in many other countries. Do you expect the search business to become more concentrated (i.e., dominated by fewer firms)? Is search a winner-take-all business?
  2. In renewing its deal with AOL, could Google afford to pay AOL more than 100% of the revenue generated from AOL searches? How did Microsoft’s maximum affordable bid for AOL’s search traffic compare to Google’s?
  3. Currently 95%+ of Google’s revenue comes from online advertising. How important is it for Google to pursue alternative revenue streams? Which alternatives are the most promising?
  4. Do you view Google’s distinctive governance structure, corporate culture, and organizational processes as strengths or potential limitations?

This question has been answered.

Get Answer