A 2010 Supreme Court decision

      Should we restrict campaign spending or contributions? A 2010 Supreme Court decision - Citizens United - opened the door for unlimited spending by individuals on behalf of political candidates. Should we take steps to reduce the influence of money on our presidential elections? We could do this either by limiting the amount of money candidates can spend directly, by limiting direct contributions, or even taking steps to limit spending on behalf of a candidate (something that would require a constitutional amendment).