You will analyze the case according to the theory you chose, and argue an ethical conclusion. Additionally, you will address the strongest counterargument to
your proposed solution, using your chosen ethical theory. You can either use an existing counterargument found in your research or create your own. You
should be very clear and detailed in making your arguments, thoroughly illustrating how and why you reached your ethical conclusion. The ethical theory that
you apply should be a central and framing aspect throughout the entire assignment.
In an argumentative paper of at least 1,200 words (excluding title, abstract, and reference pages) and citing at least three scholarly, peer-reviewed sources in
addition to required readings, address the following:
Summarize your case study and your ethical position. Briefly introduce and summarize the case study and your moral position from your Week 1 assignment.
Be sure to incorporate instructor feedback while limiting your summary to the necessary information. At the end of this section, in a thesis statement, state
the ethical theory that you will apply in this assignment, your main arguments, and your conclusions.
Apply your ethical theory to your case. In the next section of your paper, explain at least two aspects of the ethical theory you have chosen. These aspects
should be used to highlight ethical components of your argument that support your conclusion. While you can incorporate more aspects of the theory
through the assignment, you should begin in this section applying the main constructs of the theory to particular details of your case. In the next two
paragraphs, construct two arguments about how the ethical theory supports your ethical conclusion about the case. You should convincingly expand your
argument, supporting your ethical conclusion. The more detailed you can be about the ethical theory and its link to aspects of your case, the better your
argument will be.