The 21st century, more countries are researching and developing technologies for weapons of mass destruction (WMDs). There are terrorist groups and non-state actorsan individual or organization that has significant political influence but is not allied to any country or statewho are looking to further their agenda by obtaining and potentially using a WMD against their perceived enemy. This type of threat is not just a threat to one country but, rather, is a destabilizer to global security.*How and why do actors (state and non-state) philosophically justify (idealism, realism, pragmatism, or existentialism) the procession and possible use of a WMD device against a civilian population, especially in a post-9/11 era? How have WMDs evolved? Why do the state and non-state actors not see themselves as possible reasons for destabilization of global security?
Welcome to Legit Writing
