Anselm’s ontological argument

One thing that may help is to try to explain the argument to a friend who is not taking this class.

Here are some possible topics to discuss:

1. What makes the argument “work”?
2. Which critiques that were covered makes the most sense?
3. Is the parody argument a good critique to Anselm’s ontological argument?
4. What is “cool” or “frustrating” about the modal ontological argument?