Description
Turn your IP3 draft into your final IP5 paper. The annotated bibliography in IP3 must be transformed into a “literature review” in your IP5 paper. Here is an advanced view of your IP5 template: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B0QmECZPnLPhS2Z6LVNZdmdieEU/view?usp=sharing
Below are administrative recommendations. Keep up the good work.
The abstract should be a page unto itself.. If you want to see a sample abstract, please visit page two at the Owl website at http://owl.english.purdue.edu/media/pdf/20090212013008_560.pdf (1 point).
The hypothesis has a weak syntax and is confusing to read. Please rewrite it with greater English syntax. (3 point)
Regarding ethical considerations, do you need approval from an Institutional Review Board (IRB) before you conduct your research? Please discuss that in your paper. Here is a website that explains ethical considerations: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ZUt_d_kTBd0C9DraTQUg1g9RMslMHmyZ/view?usp=sharing Here is an example of unethical research that was conducted on humans for over 40 years: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B0QmECZPnLPhLWo4UXVfREhRdEk/view?usp=sharing (3 points)