The goal of this essay is to evaluate the arguments. Identify strengths, weaknesses, appeals and fallacies in
“Don’t Blame the Eater” by david zinczenko and “McDiculous” by Klosterman. Whose main ideas where more
effectively argued and why? What rhetorical appeals, logical fallacies, and audience considerations did each
author employ? A good paper will summarize the position taken by the two sources by analyzing their
rhetorical effectiveness, locate and classify the rhetorical appeals, logical fallacies, and what made each work
persuasive or not, identify and analyze relevant quotations, and evaluate the papers and produce a final verdict
about who “won” or “lost” the argument.