Proponents of banning tourism argue that it can have a negative impact on local environments due to its potential contribution towards pollution as well as an increase in waste production. It is also believed that increased visitor numbers lead to land degradation and disruption of fragile ecosystems through activities such as off-roading vehicles or littering. Furthermore, some suggest that large influxes of tourists reduce access to resources by locals due to commercialisation and price inflation from businesses seeking higher profits from visitors rather than offering them at more reasonable prices for local people. However, when managed responsibly, supporters of travel maintain that it plays an important role in helping to preserve natural resources and habitats by raising awareness amongst visitors about their need for conservation and providing economic incentives for protecting the environment through ecotourism initiatives. In addition, responsible tourism practices such as reducing energy consumption or using eco-friendly transport help reduce carbon emissions which contribute towards global climate change effects such as rising sea levels or changes in weather patterns around the world. When considering the impact upon culture, proponents of banning tourism highlight how traditional ways of life may be lost with increased visitation since locals may adopt customs from foreign guests leading to cultural erosion over time while opponents contend this same effect can actually work positively if it helps bring together different groups through mutual exchange opportunities where each side learns something valuable from its interaction with the other party’s culture via tourist events like art exhibitions or festivals meant specifically for sharing knowledge about traditions across countries’ boundaries. Additionally, some see technology advances brought by travellers adapting new forms into their own cultures allowing them access previously unavailable educational experiences beyond what they would normally have within their home nation which could potentially benefit long term growth prospects depending on how open minded citizens choose embrace these innovations over time versus rejecting them out right without giving them any chance whatsoever (i..e elearning programs). Finally turning attention towards economics results from travelling abroad we discover both positives like job creation benefits along with negatives such as income inequality generated between newcomers coming into certain destinations compared against existing residents already living there pre-tourism developments; however even here stories vary based on specific locations because while negative effects created by development might occur somewhere else those same investments made directly generate revenue improving standard livelihoods simultaneously elsewhere - thus making blanket statements either all good/bad somewhat hard come up under circumstances relevant across board no matter what location being discussed unless conducted proper research first before speaking further conclusions regarding specifics particular areas being considered overall outcome wise (i..e gentrification debates). In conclusion then although arguments exist both supporting & opposing idea banning travel altogether order protect local environments cultures economies ultimately call depends entirely upon level responsibility exercised by people visiting given destination coupled ability respective governments enforce regulations preventing irresponsible behaviour happening place keep balance between various interests stakeholders involved manner sustainable way possible long run; only once sufficient evidence gathered then decide most appropriate course action required behalf anyone wishing go holidays knowing limits set forth beforehand realistically achieve desired objectives without having detriment greater system whole itself comes down individual choice end day make sure actions taken reflect respect shown fellow human beings creatures living area visited ensure lasting legacy left behind after depart isn't detrimental nature intended instead beneficial everyone involved so everyone wins situation take notice consequences decisions made prior acting too quickly rashly ultimately regret later wish had done differently begin start fresh journey ahead us explore world joy wonder appreciation beauty present everywhere surrounding us significantly fewer worries concerning health safety future prosperity planet Earth itself going forward forever remain beautiful asset care maintain rightfully deserve look after generation come continue enjoy benefit great gift mother shared plethora species occupy currently worldwide extent our power achieve peaceful prosperous global society one day soon here hold onto hope pray strength move forward together makes possible true dreams reality much better brighter tomorrow generations follow suit our footsteps leave behind better mankind desirable end goal focus minds hearts truly collective experience share grow prosper live happily ever after become everlasting accomplishment seen witnessed all ages passed commemorate successes create bridge unite people nations break cultural barriers promote understanding understanding creates trust leads peace coexistence harmony result fruitful dialogue exists everybody lives God bless humanity!