Program Planning and evaluation

m/orders_available?subcom=detailed&id=329123579 2/3
Paper details
Select and answer one of the following discussion questions of chapter 11

  1. Develop a working plan for how you would involve stakeholders in the development of the intervention
    evaluation plan. How does your plan address timing, and budget constraints? In what ways does your plan
    include attention to interactions and group processes? Which strategies will be used to address the four criteria
    for having a good evaluation question?
  2. Select one of the five health programs implemented in Bowe County and Layetteville. Construct a levels of
    measurement table, similar to Table 11.4 for at least one outcome (depen dent) variable in three different health
    or well-being domains.
  3. What are the major problems in using secondary data sources, such as birth or death certificate data? What,
    if anything, can the evaluator do about these problems?
    Select and answer one of the following discussion questions from chapter 12
    Chapter 7 introduced the concepts of full- and partial-coverage programs. Which evaluation designs are more
    appropriate for full-coverage programs and which are more appropriate for partial-coverage programs? Justify
    your response.
    Suppose the county board of supervisors has asked you, as an evaluation consultant, to evaluate the
    immunization program for older persons and the community-based adolescent violence prevention program,
    both of which are offered throughout Bowe County. You have been asked to suggest at least three design
    options for how to evaluate each program, based on complexity and cost. Which three designs would you
    propose and why?
    Which evaluation designs are susceptible to biases due to history and maturation? Explain.
    Under what conditions would it be accurate to state that a pro gram caused the improvements in a specific
    health outcome?

This question has been answered.

Get Answer