Chen, P. Y., Chen, K. Y., & Wu, L. Y. (2017). The impact of trust and commitment on value creation in asymmetric buyer–seller relationships: the mediation effect of specific asset investments. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 32(3), 457-471.
Coffey, C. (2010). Power analysis. In N. Salkind (Ed)., Encyclopedia of research design.
Cohen, M. (2016). The Perceived Satisfaction Derived from Various Relationship Configurations. Journal of Relationships Research, 7, (10). doi:10.1017/jrr.2016.12
Community Foundation Center. (2015). Community indicators report. Retrieved from https://www.thecommunityfoundation.net/images/pdfs/RS_CIR_2015.pdf
Cozby, P. C., & Bates, S. C. (2012). Methods in behavioral research (11th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. ISBN: 9780078035159.
Cummings, L. & Bromiley, P. (1996). The organizational trust inventory (OTI). In: R. Kramer &T. Tyler (Eds.) Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research. California: Sage Publishers. pp. 302-330.
Cross, M. (2018). The new rules of philanthropy. Kiplinger’s Personal Finance, 72(4), 66-70.
Daudi, M., Hauge, J. B., & Thoben, K. D. (2016). Behavioral factors influencing partner trust in logistics collaboration: a review. Logistics Research, 9(1), 19.
Degasperi, N. C., & Mainardes, E. W. (2017). What motivates money donation? A study on external motivators. Revista de Administração (São Paulo), 52(4), 363-373.
Drollinger, T. (2018). Using active empathetic listening to build relationships with major-gift donors. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 30(1), 37-51.
Elstad, E, Christophersen, K., A, & Turmo, A. (2011). Social exchange theory as explanation
of organizational citizenship behavior among teachers. International Journal of
Leadership in Education, 14 (4), 405. doi:10.1080/13603125.2010.524250
Emerson, M, R. (1976). Social Exchange Theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 2(2), 335-
362. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2946096
Fukofuka, S. (2014). Factors that predict employee retention in profit and not-for-profit organizations. Global Journal of Human Resource Management, 23(4), 1-8.
Fyffe, S. & De Vita, C.J. (2014). Innovations in NYC health & human services policy: Strengthening nonprofits through effective cross-center collaborations. Urban Institute. Retrieved fromhttps://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/32641/413055-innovations-in-nyc-health-and-human-services-policy-strengthening-nonprofits-through-effective-cross-center-collaborations.pdf
Ghazinejad, M., Hussein, B., & Zidane, Y. (2018). Impact of trust, commitment, and openness on research project performance: Case study in a research institute. Social Sciences, 7(2), 22.
Ghiasi M, Shahrabi A, Siamian H. Relationship between Cybernetics Management and Organizational Trust among Librarians of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences (2017). Acta Inform Med. 2017, 25(4), 247-249.
Ghijsen, P. W. T., Semeijn, J., & Ernstson, S. (2010). Supplier satisfaction and commitment:
The role of influence strategies and supplier development. Journal of Purchasing and
Supply Management, 16(6), 17-26.
Giving USA. (2018). Charity Navigator, Giving statistics. Retrieved from https://store.givingusa.org/collections/special-reports-spotlights/products/giving-usa-2015-spotlight-celebrating-service-to-philanthropy-special-anniversary-edition?variant=34501858505
Giving USA. (2017). The annual report on philanthropy, Retrieved from https://givingusa.org/
Grace, K. (2005). Beyond Fundraising: New Strategies for Nonprofit Innovation and Investment. Hoboken, N.J.: Wiley.
Greenstein, T. N. (2006). Methods of family research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Haman, K. (2013). Personal connections attract donors, nonprofits. Orange County Business Journal, 36(36), 30.
Hannum, K. M., Deal, J., Howard, L. L, & Lu, L. (2011). Emerging Leadership in Nonprofit Organizations: Myths, Meaning, and Motivations. Greensboro, NC: Center for Creative Leadership.
Harvard Business Review, January–February 2016 issue, 74–79.
Head, M. G., Fitchett, J. R., Cooke, G. S., Foster, G. R., & Atun, R. (2015). Systematic analysis of funding awarded for viral hepatitis-related research to institutions in the United Kingdom. J Viral Hepat. 2015; 22(3):230–7. doi:10.1111/jvh.12300.
Herrington J. (2017). Nonprofits as Policy Solutions to the Burden of Government, Nonprofit Policy Forum, De Gruyter, vol. 8(3), pages 337-340.
Homans, G. (1961). Social behavior: Its elementary forms. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace
Jovanovich.
Hudson, B, Hardy, B, Henwood, M & Wistow, G. (2006) In Pursuit of Inter-Agency Collaboration in the Public Sector, Public Management: An International Journal of Research and Theory, 1(2), 235-260.doi: 10.1080/14719039900000005
Irefin, P., & Mechanic, M. A. (2014). Effect of employee commitment on organizational performance in Coca Cola Nigeria Limited Maiduguri, Borno state. Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 19(3), 33-41.
Johnson, C. (2016). Donor focused, data drive: empower, trust staff members to discover fresh insights. Nonprofit Times, 30(3), 14-18.
Johnston, L.M. & Finegood, D.T. (2015). Opportunities for addressing obesity and noncommunicable diseases through engagement with the private sector. Annu. Rev. Public Health, 36. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031914-122802.
K. Lamertz & D.P. Bhave (2017). Employee perceptions of organisational legitimacy
as impersonal bases of organisational trustworthiness and trust, Journal of Trust Research,
7:2,129-149, DOI: 10.1080/21515581.2017.1304220
Karabatsos, P. (2002). Foundation development: Accessing private philanthropy. Foundation Development Consultants Annual Summer Conference, Colorado Springs, Colorado
Kumar, N., Scheer, L, K., & Steenkamp, J. (1995). The effects of perceived interdependence on dealer attitudes. Journal of Marketing Research, 32, 348-358.
Lamertz, K. & Bhave, D. P. (2017) Employee perceptions of organisational legitimacy as impersonal bases of organisational trustworthiness and trust, Journal of Trust Research, 7(2), 129-149.doi: 10.1080/21515581.2017.1304220
Lanning, L. & Kloppenborg, T. (2014). Achieving Success in Nonprofit Organizations. New York: Business Expert Press.
Latting, K., Beak, M., Slack, K. & Tetrick, L. (2004). Promoting service quality and client adherence to the service plan: the role of top management’s support for innovation and learning. Administration of Social Work, 28(2), 29-48.
Leedy, P. D., & Ormrod, J. E. (2010). Practical research: Planning and design 9thedition Saddle River, NJ: Merrill. ISBN: 9780137152421
Li, Y. Z., He, T. L., Song, Y. R., Yang, Z., & Zhou, R. T. (2018). Factors impacting donors’ intention to donate to charitable crowd-funding projects in China: A UTAUT-based model. Information, Communication & Society, 21(3), 404-415.
Lurtz, K., & Kreutzer, K. (2017), Entrepreneurial orientation and social
venture creation in nonprofit organizations: The pivotal role of social risk taking and
collaboration. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 46(1)
Macy, G. (2006). Outcomes of Values and Participation in Values Expressive Non-Profit Agencies, Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management, 52(2), 125-132.
McCollum-Cloud, G. (2008). The city of collaboration: Keys to a successful community-based
nonprofit collaboration. University of Phoenix: ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/863955765?accountid=27965
MacIndoe, H., & Barman, E. (2013). Specialists, generalists, and
policy advocacy by charitable nonprofit organizations. Journal of Sociology and Social
Welfare, 40(2), 119-149. Retrieved from
http://www.wmich.edu/hhs/newsletters_journals/jssw_
institutional/institutional subscribers/40.2macindoe.pdf
Mayer, W. J., Wang, H., Egginton, J. F., & Flint, H. S. (2014). The impact of revenue diversification on expected revenue and volatility for nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43(2), 374-392 Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/089976012464696
Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (2004). TCM employee commitment survey academic users guide: Application. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Michigan Foundation (2013). Working better together: Building nonprofit collaborative capacity. Retrieved fromhttps://www.michiganfoundations.org/sites/default/files/resources/Working-Better-Together-GEO-2013.pdf
Miller, C. (2010). The four horsemen of the nonprofit financial apocalypse. The Nonprofit Quarterly, 22-29. Retrieved from http://www.nonprofitfinancefund.org/sites/default/files/4_horsemen.pdf
Morgan, R. & Hunt, S. (1994). The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58, 20-38.
Morris, T. (2012). Social work research: Four alternative paradigms. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Narasimhan, R., Nair, A., Griffith, D. A., Arlbjorn, J. S., & Bendoly, E. (2009). Lock-in situations in supply chains: A social exchange theoretic study of sourcing arrangements in buyer–supplier relationships. Journal of Operations Management, 27, 374-389.
Naskrent, J. & Siebelt, P. (2011). The influence of commitment, trust, satisfaction, and involvement on donor retention. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary & Nonprofit Organizations, 22, 757-778.
National Center for Charitable Statistics calculations of IRS Statistics of Income Division Exempt Organizations Sample (2012). Retrieved from https://www.irs.gov/charities-non-profits/form-990-series-which-forms-do-exempt-organizations-file-filing-phase-in.
Nyhan, R. C., & Marlowe, H. A. (1997). Development and psychometric properties of the organizational trust inventory. Evaluation Review, 21(5), 614-635.
Olivier, N., O’Neil, J. & Lambiase, J. (2012). Engendering relationship outcomes through stakeholder involvement: a case study of a nonprofit organization. Southwestern Mass Communication Journal, 27(3), 1-16.
O’Neil, J. (2008). An examination of the linkages among communication tactics, relationship outcomes, and donor behavior in a nonprofit. National Communication Association, 1-29.
O’Neil, J. (2008). Linking public relations tactic to long-term success: an investigation on how communications contribute to trust, satisfaction, and commitment in a nonprofit organization. Journal of Promotion Management, 14, 263-274.
O’Neil, J., Schrodt, P. & Grau, S. (2008). An examination of the linkages among communication tactics, relationship outcomes, and donor behavior in a nonprofit. National Communication Association, 1-29.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2018). Successful partnerships: A guide (2018). Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/cfe/leed/36279186.pdf
Powers, E. & Yaros, R. (2012). Cultivating support for nonprofit news organizations: commitment, trust and donating audiences. Journal of Communication Management, 17(2), 157-170.
Pradhan, G., & Keating, E. (2012). Passion and purpose revisited. Massachusetts and the last
decade’s financial roller coaster. Retrieved from
http://folio.iupui.edu/bitstream/handle/10244/1054/P%26P_2012_Final.pdf
Presidio Institute Trust (2015). Reimaging service: A case study in cross sector collaboration. Retrieved fromhttp://lapiana.org/Portals/0/Documents/Reimagining-Service-case-study-November-2015.pdf?ver=2016-01-11-172210-327
Reardon, K. (2017). Nonprofit. Business NH Magazine, 34(1), 28.
Remler, D.K., & van Ryzin, G. G. (2011). Research methods in practice: Strategies for
description and causation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Retnowati, E.; Ayres, P.; Sweller, J. (2017). Can collaborative learning improve the effectiveness of worked examples in learning mathematics? J. Educ. Psychol. 2017, 109, 666–679.
Rhodes, S. (2009). The dynamic role of the family foundation professional. Journal of Jewish Communal Service, 84(10). 32-36.
Rimes, H., Nesbit, R., Christensen, R. & Brudney, J. (2017). Exploring the dynamics of volunteer and staff interactions. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 28(2), 195-213.
Ritzer, G. (2003). Contemporary Sociological Theory and Its Classical Roots: The Basics.
Retrieved from http://highered.mcgraw-
hill.com/sites/007234962x/student_view0/chapter7/chapter_overview.html
Rogers, K. (2010). Commitment to standards, mission, clients and fun. Nonprofit Times, 24(6), 4-7.
Rooney, M., Markovitz, D., & Packard, M. (2011). The enhanced discharge planning program eases a patient’s transition home. Generations, 35(4), 78-80. Retrieved from http://web.ebscohost.comlibrary.capella.edu/ehost/pdfviewer?sid=dfa6010-f23e-4ebl-b645-65d0ca728%40sessionmgr113&vid=2&hid=118
Ruiz-Palomino, P. & Martinez-Canas, R. (2013). Ethical culture and employees’ outcomes: the mediating role of Person-organization fit. Journal of Business Ethics, 116(1), 173-188.
Rusbult, C. E., & Farrell, D. 1983. A longitudinal test of the investment model: The impact on job satisfaction, job commitment, and turnover of variations in investment model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68: 429-438.
Sargeant, A. & Lee, S. (2002). Individual and contextual antecedents of donor trust in voluntary sector. Journal of Marketing Management, 18, 779-802.
Sargeant, A. & Woodliffe, L. (2007). Building donor loyalty: the antecedents and role of commitment in the context of charity giving. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 18(2), 47-68.
Seppey, M., Ridde, V., Touré, L., & Coulibaly, A. (2017). Donor-funded project’s sustainability assessment: a qualitative case study of a results-based financing pilot in Koulikoro region, Mali. Globalization and health, 13(1), 86.
Schwab, K.A., Dustin, D.L., & Bricker, K.S. (2017). Reframing humankind’s relationship with nature: Contributions from Social Exchange Theory. Journal of Sustainability Education, Feb; 12. Retrieved from http://www.susted.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Schwab-JSE-Feb-2017-General-Issue-PDF.pdf
Sefora, N. (206). Volunteers trust in organizational mission, leadership and activities efficiency. Annals of the University of Oradea, 25(1), 995-1001.
Sharma, A., Goel, A., & Sengupta, S. (2017). How does Work Engagement vary with Employee Demography? —Revelations from the Indian IT industry. Procedia computer science, 122, 146-153.
Shiau, W.-L., & Luo, M.-M. (2012). Factors affecting online group buying intention and satisfaction: A social exchange theory perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 2431-2444.
Siegerink, F. M. L. F. V., Boarini, A. A. Y. A. R., Hortala, S. G. G. G. R., & Lee–Zsuzsanna, V. S. K. D (2018). Trust and its Determinants: Evidence from the Trustlab Experiment
Snow, J. (2012). Engaging your community: A toolkit for partnership, collaboration, and actions. Department of Health and Human Services. Retrieved from https://www.jsi.com/JSIInternet/Inc/Common/_download_pub.cfm?id=14333&lid=3
Sontag-Padilla, L. M. Staplefoote, L., & Morganti, K. G. (2012). Financial stability for nonprofit organizations: A review of the literature. Rand Corporation. Retrieved from https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/research_reports/RR100/RR121/RAND_RR121.pdf
Sprenkle, D. H., & Piercy, F. P. (Eds.). (2005). Research methods in family therapy. New
York, NY: Guilford Press.
Stafford, L. (2013). Social exchange theories. In L. A. Baxter and D. O. Braithwaite (Eds.),
Engaging theories in interpersonal communication: Multiple perspectives. Thousand Oaks
pp. 377.89.
Stern, M. J., Coleman, K. J. (2015). The multidimensionality of trust: Applications in
collaborative natural resource management. Society & Natural Resources, 28, 117-132.
Suarez, D. F. (2011). Collaboration and professionalization: The contours of public sector funding for nonprofit organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(2), 307-326. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10/1093/jpart/muq049
TaxWorld Exempt. November 18, 2018. Retrieved from https://www.taxexemptworld.com/advanced.asp
Thomas, M, A. (2016). The Nature of Sustainability. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Chapbook Press ISBN 9781943359394.
The Arc. (2015). Strategic partnerships: A guide (2015). Retrieved from http://www.thearcsusquehanna.org/uploads/1/0/9/1/109151423/03-strategic-partnerships-7-14-2015.pdf
Trochim, W. M. K. & Donnelly, P, J. (2016). Research methods: The essential knowledge base. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
United States Census Bureau. (2017). United States — County by State, and for Puerto Rico. Retrieved from https://factfinder.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?src=bkmk
United States Census Bureau. (2010). United States — County by State, and for Puerto Rico. Retrieved from https://factfinder.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?src=bkmk
Van Bussel, M. & Doherty, A. (2015). An examination of the conflict process in nonprofit community sport boards. European Sport Management Quarterly, 15(2), 176-194.doi: 10.1080/16184742.2015.1019534
Van Gorp, S. (2012). Innovation in the nonprofit organization context: Examining the strategic significance of systems trust and individual resistance to change. Iowa Research Online, 1-147. Retrieved from https://ir.uiowa.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3150&context=etd
Verschuere, B., & De Corte, J. (2014). The impact of public resource dependence on the
autonomy of NPOs in their strategic decision making. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector
Quarterly, 43(2), 293-313. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0899764012462072
Walden, J., Jung, E. H., & Westerman, C. K. (2017). Employee communication, job engagement, and organizational commitment: A study of members of the Millennial Generation. Journal of Public Relations Research, 29(2/3), 73-89. doi: 10.1080/1062726X.2017.1329737
Waters, R. & Bortree, D. (2010). Building a better workplace for teen volunteers through inclusive behaviors. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 20(3), 337-355.
Werkema, R. D., Leiserson, G., & Ansel, D. (2005). The Massachusetts nonprofit sector: An
economic profile. Retrieved from http://www.massinc.org/
Wilkins, S., Butt, M. M., & Annabi, C. A. (2017). The effects of employee commitment in transnational higher education: The case of international branch campuses. Journal of Studies in International Education, 21(4), 295-314.
Willems, J., Jegers, M., & Faulk, L. (2015) Organizational Effectiveness Reputation in the Nonprofit Sector. Public Performance & Management Review, 39(2), 454-475. doi: 10.1080/15309576.2015.1108802
Yang, Y. F. (2016). Examining competing models of transformational leadership, leadership trust, change commitment, and job satisfaction. Psychological Reports, 119(1), 154-173.
Zafirovski, M. (2015). Social exchange theories under scrutiny: A positive critique of its
economic behaviorist formulations. Journal of Sociology, 22(4), 110-121.
Retrieved from http://www.socialogy.org/content/2015/tier2/setheory.pdf
Zapata, C., P, Olsen, J. E., & Martins, L.L, (2013). Social exchange from the supervisors’ perspective; Employee trustworthiness as a predictor of interpersonal and informational justice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decisions Processes, 121 (3), 1-12. Retrieved from https://www.journals.elsevier.com/organizational-behavior-and-human-decision-processes
STATEMENT OF ORIGINAL WORK
Academic Honesty Policy
Capella University’s Academic Honesty Policy (3.01.01) holds learners accountable for the integrity of work they submit, which includes but is not limited to discussion postings, assignments, comprehensive exams, and the dissertation or capstone project.
Established in the Policy are the expectations for original work, rationale for the policy, definition of terms that pertain to academic honesty and original work, and disciplinary consequences of academic dishonesty. Also stated in the Policy is the expectation that learners will follow APA rules for citing another person’s ideas or works.
The following standards for original work and definition of plagiarism are discussed in the Policy:
Learners are expected to be the sole authors of their work and to acknowledge the authorship of others’ work through proper citation and reference. Use of another person’s ideas, including another learner’s, without proper reference or citation constitutes plagiarism and academic dishonesty and is prohibited conduct. (p. 1)
Plagiarism is one example of academic dishonesty. Plagiarism is presenting someone else’s ideas or work as your own. Plagiarism also includes copying verbatim or rephrasing ideas without properly acknowledging the source by author, date, and publication medium. (p. 2)
Capella University’s Research Misconduct Policy (3.03.06) holds learners accountable for research integrity. What constitutes research misconduct is discussed in the Policy?
Research misconduct includes but is not limited to falsification, fabrication, plagiarism, misappropriation, or other practices that seriously deviate from those that are commonly accepted within the academic community for proposing, conducting, or reviewing research, or in reporting research results. (p. 1)
Learners failing to abide by these policies are subject to consequences, including but not limited to dismissal or revocation of the degree.
Statement of Original Work and Signature
I have read, understood, and abided by Capella University’s Academic Honesty Policy (3.01.01) and Research Misconduct Policy (3.03.06), including Policy Statements, Rationale, and Definitions.
I attest that this dissertation or capstone project is my own work. Where I have used the ideas or words of others, I have paraphrased, summarized, or used direct quotes following the guidelines set forth in the APA Publication Manual.
Learner name
and date
APPENDIX A. DEMOGRAPHIC SURVEY
Please respond to the following questions by placing a check mark in the appropriate box. Fill in any information you are willing to share on the lines provided.
Demographic Survey
- How do you identify your gender ___________________________________________________?
- What is your age __?
- What is your highest level of education?
_ a. Less than high school b. High school/GED
c. Associate’s degree d. Bachelor’s degree
e. Master’s degree _ f. Doctorate - How many years have you worked for an Non Profit Organization (NPO) __?
- How many NPO collaborations have you participated in within the Riverside and San Bernardino area __?
- What is the size of the NPO you represented in your most recent collaboration?
_ a. 3-5 employees/volunteers b. 6-10 employees/volunteers
c. 11-15 employees/volunteers d. 16-21 employees/volunteers
__ e. 22 or more or employees/volunteers - How old is the organization you represented in your most recent collaboration _?
- What was your position in your organization at the time of your participation in collaborative work for the purpose of funding?
APPENDIX B. MEYER AND ALLEN’S EMPLOYEE COMMITMENT (TCM) SURVEY
Directions: Please answer the following questions using a five-point Likert
1 2 3 4 5
Never Sometimes Always
Occasionally Often
1._____I feel/felt (co) responsible for improvements in the collaborative.
2._____I feel/felt (co) responsible for the reputation of the collaborative.
3._____I feel/felt (co)responsible for keeping this collaboration running.
4._____I feel/felt (co)responsible for changes being made during the collaboration process.
5._____When working as a collaboration member, I have/had to repeat the same tasks over and over again.
6.______When working as a collaboration member, I have/had to handle unexpected situations.
7._____When working as a collaboration member, I have/had to deal with problems that were difficult to solve.
8._____When working as a collaboration member, I would have/had liked to have more variety in my assignments.
9._____When working as a collaboration member, it often seemed that I had too many things to do.
10.____When working as a collaboration member, I was often asked to do more work than I could handle based on the benefits.
11.____The benefits I received were better than most other collaborations received.
12.____I feel/felt valued by other collaboration members.
13.____Most collaboration members got along very well with other collaboration members.
14._____Leaders within the collaboration treated me fairly.
15._____My collaboration members could be relied on when things get tough in my job
16._____My organization has/had a good reputation at this collaboration
17._____I am/was highly respected by my collaboration team.
APPENDIX C. OTI SURVEY
Directions: Please answer the following questions using a five-point Likert scale. Interpret the blank spaces as referring to the other members of the collaborative about which you are commenting.
1 2 3 4 5
Never Sometimes Always
Occasionally Often
- _ I think/thought the people in _____ tell/told the truth in negotiations.
- _ I think/thought that _ meets/met its negotiated obligations to the overall efforts of the group.
- _ In my opinion __ is reliable
- _ I think that the people in _ succeed by stepping on other people.
- _ I feel/felt that _____tries/tried to gain the upper hand.
- _ I think/thought that _ takes/took advantage of our problems.
- _ I feel/felt that negotiates/negotiated with us honestly.
- _ I feel/felt that _____will/would keep its word.
- _ I think/thought ______does/did not mislead us.
- _ I feel/felt that ____tries/tried to get out of its commitments.
- _ I feel/felt that ____negotiates/negotiated joint expectations fairly.
- _ I feel/felt that ____takes/took advantage of people who are/were vulnerable.