1. Select a healthcare policy issue (meaning an “existing law”) anywhere globally, federal, state or local that you would like to change.
2. Identify the “existing law” (e.g., by Public Law Number, (e.g., USC if it is a Federal law that has been codified, State Statute Number if it is a State law or other identifying designation) which clearly shows the law is in existence somewhere globally. Please provide a detailed explanation on the law.
What is it? Why does it exist? Its history. Who/what group implemented it. Who opposes it, who supports it– the details, the specific language of your “existing law” and proposed change, as well as, operationalization of the proposed policy/definition of terms (i.e., meaning – what it will take to get your proposed change into law such as financing, support from concerned groups etc); explanations using scientific literature other similar policies and/or if this policy exists elsewhere, as well as, identifying and addressing the expected concerns of suspected opposing interest groups
3. Thereafter, conduct an extensive literature review/investigation of their proposed policy change to an “existing” policy/law (including but not limited to comparable legislation, cost of proposed policy, and source of funding to implement and maintain said policy). I would recommend using 4-6 literature review/investigation. (they are required to be used, cited and referenced)
4. Moreover, shall include details on how you intend to formulate, implement, finance and modify an “existing law” with their proposed health policy change as well as identifying and addressing the likely arguments of opposing concerned interest groups. Everything that is highlighted needs to be addressed.
You are to use peer review journal sources and books (they are required to be used, cited and referenced) as the means on how you gathered your data for the highlighted section: details on how they intend to formulate, implement, finance and modify an “existing law” with their proposed health policy change as well as identifying and addressing the likely arguments of opposing concerned interest groups. I suggest in using 4-6 peer review journal sources and books