Max Points: 190
Details:
In addition to the Affordable Care Act (ACA), there are multitudes of other state and federal regulations that apply to health care. In this assignment, you will investigate these regulations and their influence on quality of care as well as organizational effectiveness and sustainability.
General Requirements:
Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:
• Instructors will be using a grading rubric to grade the assignments. It is recommended that learners review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment in order to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.
• Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
• This assignment requires that at least two additional scholarly research sources related to this topic, and at least one in-text citation from each source be included.
• You are not required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.
Directions:
Research one state and one federal law other than the Affordable Care Act (ACA) with which health care organizations must currently comply and that seem to be contradictory to one another.
Prepare a presentation of 10-12 slides with speaker notes for each slide. Appropriate APA format should be used for references and citations. The references slide(s) are in addition to the slide count given above. The presentation should do the following:
1. Identify each of the laws (one state and one federal) being addressed.
2. Outline the major provisions of each law.
3. List current and potential effects of each law on the quality of patient care.
4. List current and potential effects of each law on the effectiveness of health care organizations under the law.
5. List current and potential effects of each law on organizational sustainability.
6. List the ethical issues that could arise through compliance with each law.
State v. Federal Laws
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00% 2
Less Than Satisfactory
74.00% 3
Satisfactory
79.00% 4
Good
87.00% 5
Excellent
100.00%
85.0 %Content
15.0 %Identification of Laws and Outlines of Major Provisions The slides identifying the laws and displaying outlines of the major provisions of the laws being addressed are either missing or not evident to the reader. The slides identifying the laws and displaying outlines of the major provisions of the laws being addressed are present, but the legal information is incomplete or inaccurate. The speaker notes are incomplete or inaccurate. The slides identifying the laws and displaying outlines of the major provisions of the laws being addressed are presented, but the outlines and speaker notes are lacking in sufficient detail. The research used for support is outdated. The slides identifying the laws and displaying outlines of the major provisions of the laws being addressed are presented. The outlines include all necessary elements, and the speaker notes include a meaningful amount of detail. The outlines and speaker notes are moderately well supported though some sources of support are outdated. The slides identifying the laws and displaying outlines of the major provisions of the laws being addressed are presented. The outlines include all necessary elements, and the speaker notes include significant and rich detail. The outlines and speaker notes are well supported with current and/or seminal research.
15.0 %Current and Potential Effects of Each Law on the Quality of Patient Care The slides identifying current and potential effects of each law on the quality of patient care are either missing or not evident to the reader. The slides identifying current and potential effects of each law on the quality of patient care are present, but incomplete or inaccurate. The speaker notes are incomplete or inaccurate. The slides identifying current and potential effects of each law on the quality of patient care are present, but lack reasonable detail in the speaker notes. The research used for support is outdated. The slides identifying current and potential effects of each law on the quality of patient care are present and include thorough speaker notes. The list and speaker notes are moderately well supported though some sources of support are outdated. The slides identifying current and potential effects of each law on the quality of patient care are present and include thorough and well-detailed speaker notes. The list and speaker notes are well supported with current and/or seminal research.
15.0 %Current and Potential Effects of Each Law on the Effectiveness of Health Care Organizations Under the Law The slides identifying current and potential effects of each law on the effectiveness of health care organizations under the law are either missing or not evident to the reader. The slides identifying current and potential effects of each law on the effectiveness of health care organizations under the law are present, but incomplete or inaccurate. The speaker notes are incomplete or inaccurate. The slides identifying current and potential effects of each law on the effectiveness of health care organizations under the law are present, but lack reasonable detail in the speaker notes. The research used for support is outdated. The slides identifying current and potential effects of each law on the effectiveness of health care organizations under the law are present and include thorough speaker notes. The list and speaker notes are moderately well supported though some sources of support are outdated. The slides identifying current and potential effects of each law on the effectiveness of health care organizations under the law are present and include thorough and well-detailed speaker notes. The list and speaker notes are well supported with current and/or seminal research.
15.0 %Current and Potential Effects of Each Law on Organizational Sustainability The slides identifying current and potential effects of each law on organizational sustainability are either missing or not evident to the reader. The slides identifying current and potential effects of each law on organizational sustainability are present, but incomplete or inaccurate. The speaker notes are incomplete or inaccurate. The slides identifying current and potential effects of each law on organizational sustainability are present, but lack reasonable detail in the speaker notes. The research used for support is outdated. The slides identifying current and potential effects of each law on organizational sustainability are present and include thorough speaker notes. The list and speaker notes are moderately well supported though some sources of support are outdated. The slides identifying current and potential effects of each law on organizational sustainability are present and include thorough and well-detailed speaker notes. The list and speaker notes are well supported with current and/or seminal research.
15.0 %Ethical Issues that Could Arise Through Compliance With Each Law The slides identifying the ethical issues that could arise through compliance with each law are either missing or not evident to the reader. The slides identifying the ethical issues that could arise through compliance with each law are present, but incomplete or inaccurate. The speaker notes are incomplete or inaccurate. The slides identifying the ethical issues that could arise through compliance with each law are present, but lack reasonable detail in the speaker notes. The research used for support is outdated. The slides identifying the ethical issues that could arise through compliance with each law are present and include thorough speaker notes. The list and speaker notes are moderately well supported though some sources of support are outdated. The slides identifying the ethical issues that could arise through compliance with each law are present and include thorough and well-detailed speaker notes. The list and speaker notes are well supported with current and/or seminal research.
10.0 %Synthesis and Argument No synthesis of source information is evident. Statement of purpose is not followed to a justifiable conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses non-credible sources. Synthesis of source information is attempted, but is not successful. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Synthesis of source information is present, but pedantic. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Synthesis of source information is present and meaningful. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Synthesis of source information is present and scholarly. Argument is clear and convincing presenting a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. The synthesis and argument in the paper are of publication caliber.
5.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing in Speaker Notes (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) Mechanical errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
10.0 %Format
5.0 %Presentation Mechanics The piece is not neat or organized, and it does not include all required elements. The work is not neat and includes minor flaws or omissions of required elements. The overall appearance is general, and major elements are missing. The presentation is good. The overall appearance is generally neat, with a few minor flaws or missing elements. The work is well presented and includes all required elements. The overall appearance is neat and professional.
5.0 %APA Format Required format is rarely followed correctly. An appropriate number of topic-related scholarly research sources and related in-text citations is not present. No reference page is included. No citations are used. Required format is attempted, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Some included sources are not scholarly research or topic-related. Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. Required format is used correctly, although some minor errors may be present. Scholarly research sources are present and topic-related, but the source and quality of some references is questionable. Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. Required format is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. Scholarly research accounts for the majority of sources presented and is topic-related and obtained from reputable professional sources. Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct. The document is correctly formatted to publication standards. All research presented is scholarly, topic-related, and obtained from highly respected, professional, original sources. In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error. The paper could readily be accepted for publication.
100 %Total Weightage